Peec AI is a pure AI search analytics tool, while Writesonic tracks AI visibility and then acts on the gaps with an AI writer and agents, though most of that execution sits on its Enterprise plan. Peec AI suits teams that will do the content work themselves, and Writesonic suits teams that want tracking and drafting in one product. DeepSmith is a strong alternative for teams that want both on a self-serve plan, with tracking and publish-ready articles together, a fixed monthly article allowance, and Autowrite writing each piece on its scheduled date.
Choosing between Peec AI and Writesonic mostly comes down to one question: do you only need to see where your brand stands in AI answers, or do you also need help fixing what you find? Peec AI covers the first part and says plainly that you create the content yourself. Writesonic covers both, but its self-serve plans track three engines and hold back most of the action features. DeepSmith sits in the same space and puts tracking and production on one self-serve plan.
Peec AI vs Writesonic: the short answer
- Choose DeepSmith if you want AI visibility tracking and publish-ready articles on one self-serve plan, starting at $99 a month with 20 articles, 50 tracked prompts and five seats, plus Autowrite and channel repurposing.
- Choose Peec AI if tracking is the whole job, you have your own writers or tools, and you want unlimited users, languages and competitors from $95 a month.
- Choose Writesonic if you want tracking and an AI writer from one vendor, you are fine with three engines on self-serve plans, and you expect to go to Enterprise for the full action tooling.
| Criterion | DeepSmith | Peec AI | Writesonic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price (monthly) | $99/mo (Pro) | $95/mo (Starter) | $99/mo (Starter) |
| Entry price (annual, per month) | $80/mo | $80/mo (observed 2026-09-04) | $79/mo |
| Prompts at entry tier | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Engines at entry tier | 1 (ChatGPT) | 3 of your choice from 6 | 3 (ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) |
| Most engines on any plan | 10 (Enterprise) | Up to 13 (Enterprise, per plan card) | 10 (Enterprise) |
| Free trial | Yes, 7 days | Yes, length not stated | Yes, 7 days, no card |
| Citation tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Long-form article generation | Yes, 20 per month at entry | No | Yes, 15 per month at entry |
| Publishes to a CMS | Yes | Not listed | Yes |
| Brand voice and context grounding | Yes | Partial | Yes |
| Repurposes articles into channel formats | Yes | Not listed | Partial |
| SOC 2 report | Yes (SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certified) | No | Yes (claims Type II) |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 | 4.8/5 | 4.7/5 |
Pricing and features as of September 2026, from each vendor's site and public reviews.
Peec AI
Peec AI is an AI search analytics tool from a Berlin company founded in January 2025. It runs your tracked prompts through AI engines every day, mostly by scraping their consumer interfaces, and reports visibility, position, sentiment, share of voice and the sources each answer cites. It is built for SEO, content and marketing teams, and for agencies with several client brands, who want prompt-level tracking at a published price and who will handle the content work themselves.
The standout is how much sits on the entry plan. Starter is $95 a month for 50 prompts and three active models, and it already includes source analytics, query fanouts, AI shopping, an ads library and recommended actions. Every plan has unlimited users, languages and competitors. Peec AI also reads server logs to show which AI bots visit your site, which is a separate data product from the answer tracking.
The real limitation is that nothing in the product writes content. Peec's own documentation says you create the content yourself, and a brief or a page rewrite only happens if you ask an outside assistant over its MCP server. Self-serve plans choose three models from six, with Perplexity as a paid add-on, and there is no SOC 2 report yet.
Reviewers on G2 give it 4.8/5 from 20 reviews as of September 2026, mostly praising the interface, quick setup and support. That is a small base, so it says more about ease of use than about long-term reliability.
Writesonic
Writesonic started in 2021 as an AI writing tool and now calls itself an AI search growth engine. It tracks prompts daily and reports mentions, citations, share of voice and sentiment, then adds an Action Center that ranks on-page, off-page and technical fixes, plus agents and an Article Writer that produce content. It is aimed at marketing, SEO and content teams, and at agencies, that want tracking and execution from the same vendor.
The standout is that combination. Self-serve plans run from $79 to $399 a month billed annually and include 15, 25 or 50 articles a month, site audits, AI crawler analytics and one-click export to WordPress. The pricing page publishes its prompt, answer, article and seat limits, so the packages are easy to inspect, and there is a 7-day free trial with no card.
The limitation is where the strongest parts live. Self-serve plans track only ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, and the full Action Center, content optimization, alerts, page-level citation tracking, shopping tracking and SSO are Enterprise only. Growth gets a limited Action Center of five on-page and five off-page actions a month. Each self-serve plan also covers one market.
Its G2 listing shows 4.7/5 from 2,133 reviews, but most of that history evaluates the older writing product, and the AI visibility product has far fewer reviews. Recurring complaints in the review base are about pricing, credits and output that needs editing.
DeepSmith: the alternative that tracks and writes on one plan
Peec AI leaves the content step to you, and Writesonic includes it but keeps most of the action tooling on Enterprise. DeepSmith is built for the reader who wants the whole loop, from seeing the gap to publishing the article, without a sales call. It is an AI search analytics and content production platform in one, so what the tracking finds feeds what the Writer produces next.
Writesonic's self-serve plans also include a monthly article allowance, so the difference is not whether articles are included. It is what surrounds them. On the tracking side, DeepSmith reports mention rate, citation rate, share of voice, sentiment and trend, shows which of your own pages AI actually cites, and lists which competitor pages win citations for your prompts.
On the production side, Opportunity Agents read your visibility data and your Content Map and return content ideas, each with the data point that justifies it. Those ideas move into Planned Content, where giving an idea a date plans it. The Writer then turns a planned idea into a finished, brand-grounded article, researched, linked internally and externally, with a cover image and publish-ready metadata, all shaped by the brand context stored in Deep IQ. Autowrite goes a step further and writes the article on its scheduled date with no one in the app. Neither vendor's record in this comparison describes a scheduled write-on-date feature.
From Produced Content you review, edit and publish straight to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity or Contentful, and Repurpose and the Apps Library turn each article into versions for LinkedIn, X, newsletters and other channels. The Writesonic record describes its Content Agent writing LinkedIn posts and X threads from a brief, but not turning an existing article into channel versions.
Plans are $99, $199 and $399 a month (Pro, Grow and Scale), or $80, $160 and $299 billed annually. They include 20, 40 and 90 articles a month, and 50, 100 and 200 tracked prompts. Engines rise by tier, with ChatGPT on Pro, Perplexity added at Grow and Gemini at Scale, and all ten engines on Enterprise. There is a 7-day free trial and no long-term contract.
Engine coverage
Peec AI has the edge on self-serve engine choice. Both tools track three engines on their self-serve plans, but Peec AI lets you pick which three. Starter, Pro and Advanced each choose three active models from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini and Naver AI. Perplexity is a paid add-on at $30, $70 or $140 a month billed annually. Writesonic's self-serve plans are fixed at ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, and its other seven engines, including Perplexity and Claude, are Enterprise only.
At the top end the two are close. Writesonic names ten engines on Enterprise, and Peec's Enterprise plan card says up to 13 models, though the plan grid lists 14 names including several labeled as API models, so the exact count is not settled.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith ties engine coverage to the plan. Pro tracks ChatGPT, Grow adds Perplexity, Scale adds Gemini, and Enterprise covers all ten named engines. Because the same plan also produces the articles, a team picks one tier for tracking and writing together instead of sizing two products separately.
Tracking depth and data method
Peec AI is deeper on tracking at lower tiers. Both tools say they collect answers by visiting the AI engines' consumer interfaces rather than calling official APIs, and both run daily. Peec AI stores the raw answer for every prompt in a Chats table, reports sources at domain and URL level, scores sentiment from 0 to 100, tracks the average rank of your brand inside an answer, and shows the sub-queries engines ran. Most of that is on every brand plan.
Writesonic covers much of the same ground, with answer text, citation analysis, share of voice and query fanouts, and it adds a prompt volume tool built on a claimed dataset of more than 2 billion AI conversations. Some pieces are gated, though. Sentiment starts at Growth, page-level citation tracking is Enterprise only, and its record finds shopping rank but no organic in-answer position metric.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith keeps mention rate and citation rate as separate metrics, with share of voice, sentiment and a visibility trend beside them. Its Pages view shows which of your pages AI cites and the prompts behind each, and its Competitors view shows which competitor pages win citations, so a gap in the numbers points at a specific page to write or improve.
Pricing and value
In Writesonic vs Peec AI pricing on tracking alone, Peec AI gives you more prompts for the money as you move up. Billed annually, Peec's 50, 150 and 350 prompts cost about $80, $205 and $420 a month (annual figures observed on 2026-09-04), while Writesonic's 50, 100 and 200 prompts cost $79, $199 and $399. Peec AI also includes unlimited users on every plan. Writesonic includes one to three users and charges $50 a month for each extra user on Basic and Growth.
Writesonic wins on what the entry plan covers, because its plans include 15, 25 or 50 articles a month, site audits and a card-free trial. Its pricing page shows annual per-month prices only. The monthly figures of $99, $249 and $499 are implied by the page's savings badges, and only the Starter figure is stated on a vendor page, so confirm them before you budget on a monthly basis.
For a team that needs both, the real comparison is a tracker plus a writer against one plan. Peec AI at $95 a month leaves the writing to a second tool or to your own staff, and Writesonic gets both but reserves execution features for a custom contract.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith publishes every self-serve price. Pro is $99 a month for 50 prompts, 20 articles and five seats, Grow is $199 for 100 prompts, 40 articles and seven seats, and Scale is $399 for 200 prompts, 90 articles and ten seats. Autowrite, Repurpose and the Apps Library are part of the product rather than add-ons.
From insight to action
On Peec AI vs Writesonic tracking and content writing, Writesonic wins this axis, because Peec AI does not write. Peec's Actions feature gives prioritized on-page and off-page steps with a Relative Opportunity Score on every plan, and it is useful for knowing what to fix. Producing the page is up to you, and Peec's own FAQ says that is intentional. The most it offers is an outside assistant, connected over MCP, that can turn Peec data into a brief.
Writesonic closes more of the loop. Its Action Center ranks fixes by an impact, confidence and effort score, and its Article Writer claims long-form articles of 3,000 to 8,000 words with citations, FAQs, schema, internal links and images. Those are the vendor's own claims. The catch is gating. The full Action Center is Enterprise only, Starter and Basic get none of it, and Growth gets five on-page and five off-page actions a month.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith runs the whole path on its self-serve plans. Opportunity Agents turn visibility and coverage data into evidence-backed ideas, the Writer produces publish-ready articles in your voice, and Autowrite can take a planned piece to the review queue with no one in the app. Repurpose then adapts each finished article for the channels you publish on, so distribution stops being a separate project.
Security and data access
Writesonic has the stronger certification story on paper. It claims SOC 2 Type II, GDPR and HIPAA compliance, although its record could not verify the report itself. Peec AI said in January 2026 that it was pursuing SOC 2 and had no report to share as of its latest check. Both offer SSO on Enterprise only.
For data access, Peec AI lists an MCP server on every brand plan and exports to CSV, with a documented beta API that its docs limit to Enterprise. Writesonic offers an API, webhooks and an MCP server, but its pricing grid does not say which plans include them. DeepSmith is SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certified and has a read-only API and MCP server that spend no credits on reads.
Which should you choose
- DeepSmith fits a marketing team that wants to see where it is missing from AI answers and publish the content that closes the gap from one self-serve plan, with a fixed monthly article allowance, scheduled hands-off writing, and channel versions of every article.
- Peec AI fits a team or agency that already has writers or its own AI tools and wants the deepest tracking for the price, with unlimited users, languages and competitors. It is the cleaner choice of the two if you only need analytics.
- Writesonic fits a team that wants tracking and an AI writer from one vendor and is comfortable with three engines on self-serve plans, or that plans to buy Enterprise for the full Action Center and ten engines.
Start a free DeepSmith trial to track your prompts and produce your first publish-ready article in the same workspace.
