A client just asked whether they show up in ChatGPT. You did not have a clean answer, and that stung a little. If that is you right now, take a breath. You are not behind. You are early, and early is a good place to be.
Here is the shift you are feeling. Buyers now ask AI assistants the questions they used to type into Google, and those assistants name a handful of brands in the answer. Your client wants to be one of them. That means you need a way to see where each client shows up, where they lose to a competitor, and what you did about it this month. This guide walks you through the best AI brand monitoring tools for agencies so you can pick one, package it as a service, and stop improvising per account.
We looked at four platforms built for or actively sold to agencies: DeepSmith, Mentionable, Otterly.AI, and Profound. Each one lets you monitor client brands in AI answers across several engines and manage more than one client at a time. They differ in engine coverage, how they handle white-label reporting, and whether they also produce the content that closes the gap. Let's find the one that fits how you actually deliver.
Think of agency AI brand monitoring as a productized service, not a one-off experiment. Done well, it becomes a standing line item: a monthly report your client can see, tied to a plan of action you own. The tool is just the engine underneath. What you are really choosing is how much of the workflow, from tracking to reporting to producing the fix, you want in one place versus stitched together yourself.
How we chose these tools
You deserve to know the criteria before the ranking, because the criteria are what make a roundup worth trusting. We included a tool only if it does three things: it is marketed to agencies or has an agency-shaped tier, it supports separate workspaces for multiple clients, and it covers at least four major AI answer engines.
From there, we weighed the features that matter to an agency P&L. Multi-client architecture, so one client's voice never leaks into another's report. Engine coverage, so you can show up where your client's buyers actually ask. A white-label or agency-branded report you can put your logo on. Share-of-voice benchmarking against each client's named competitors. And pricing that stays predictable as your roster grows.
One honest note. Inclusion here is not an endorsement, and none of these tools is right for everyone. The order reflects breadth of agency-shaped features weighed against total cost for a small to mid-sized shop. Where a competitor is the better call, we say so.
We deliberately left some categories out. Pure SEO rank trackers, pure content optimization tools, and citation-level trackers that ignore AI surfaces are not on this list, because none of them answers the question your client is actually asking. Good agency AI brand monitoring lives at the AI answer layer: it watches what ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and the rest say when a buyer asks about your client's category, and it tells you whether your client is in that answer or a competitor is. That is the lens we used, and it is the lens your client cares about.
The four tools at a glance
Start with the table, then read the entries for the two or three that fit your situation. You do not need to study all four.
| Tool | Agency entry tier | AI engines at that tier | White-label path | Multi-client setup | Monitoring or production |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSmith | Grow $199/mo ($160 annual) or Scale $399/mo ($299 annual) | 2 on Grow, 3 on Scale, 5 at Enterprise | Looker Studio connector plus on-platform metrics | Multi-Workspace, fully isolated per client | Both: tracking plus content production |
| Mentionable | Agency €299/mo | 7, or 8 on the Agency page with Grok | Native branded reports | Unlimited client projects and users | Monitoring and audits only |
| Otterly.AI | Standard $189/mo plus Agency Partner Program | 4 in base, up to 7 with add-ons | Looker Studio templates with your branding | Unlimited workspaces, pitch environments | Monitoring and GEO audit only |
| Profound | Growth around $399/mo ($332.50 annual) | 3 at that tier | CSV, JSON, and API exports | Agency Mode with per-client workspaces | Both, lighter on production |
1. DeepSmith
Best for agencies that want to track and produce under one login, where each client gets an isolated workspace and the same data that surfaces a gap also writes the article to close it.
Most monitoring tools hand you a chart and leave the hard part to you. You still have to brief a writer, chase the draft, do the internal linking, and build the report. DeepSmith is built around a different idea: the gap you find and the content you ship should live in the same place, grounded in the same per-client context. That is why it sits at the top of this list for agencies whose deliverable is ongoing content, not just a monthly audit.
Here is how it works day to day. You define the questions each client's buyers ask, and the platform checks them on a schedule. It reports mention rate (how often AI names the brand), citation rate (how often AI links to the client's pages as a source), share of voice against the client's tracked competitors, and the visibility trend over time. When a prompt shows the client losing, that gap feeds an idea bank, and the writer turns it into an on-brand article with SEO, internal links, and metadata already built in. A strategist reviews for judgment, not mechanics.
The piece that makes this work for agencies is Deep IQ, the per-workspace brand context. Each client's positioning, products, personas, brand voice, and visual guidelines are stored once and used by every output, so drafts come out in that client's voice with that client's product facts. No cross-client bleed, and no re-briefing a fresh writer every week. Multi-Workspace keeps each account fully isolated, with its own content queue, plan, and team invitations under a single login. For reporting, a Looker Studio connector feeds per-prompt citation and mention rates, page-level attribution, and the competitor leaderboard into a dashboard you can brand as your own.
Key features to know:
- Multi-Workspace: one login, isolated per-client environments, separate context and plan for each account.
- AEO tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Mode, gated by tier.
- Content Studio: research-to-publish-ready articles, with an Autowrite option that produces on a schedule.
- Looker Studio connector for white-label AI brand monitoring inputs.
- Apps Library: every finished article arrives with social and channel formats ready to distribute.
- Publishing to WordPress, Strapi, Webflow, or custom webhooks, with Markdown and HTML export as a fallback.
Pricing is straightforward. Pro is $99/mo ($80 annual) with 20 articles, 50 prompts, and ChatGPT only. Grow, the most popular tier, is $199/mo ($160 annual) with 40 articles, 100 prompts, and Perplexity added. Scale is $399/mo ($299 annual) with 90 articles, 200 prompts, and Gemini added. Enterprise is custom, covers all five engines, and adds 1:1 onboarding and a dedicated account manager. There is a 7-day free trial with real data and real drafts, and no long-term contracts.
Agencies have said good things about the output. Aparna K, a GTM Lead at Skooc, put it plainly: "Went from four articles a month to fifteen with the same two people." Pallav A., an SEO Specialist at Tahshop AI, said "Drafts come out close to final because the system has context it needs."
One honest limitation. Five named engines is the smallest set among these four tools. If a client specifically needs Amazon Rufus, Meta AI, or DeepSeek tracking, DeepSmith alone will not cover it, and the article caps (20 to 90 per workspace on the public tiers) are hard limits that push heavy retainers to Enterprise. If your service is pure monitoring with the widest possible engine list and no production, one of the tools below may fit better. If your service is monitoring plus the content that acts on it, this is the one to start with.
2. Mentionable
Best for agencies whose core deliverable is the report itself, and who want native white-label PDFs and unlimited client projects at a flat monthly price.
Mentionable is built specifically for agencies, and its Agency tier is the headline. For €299/mo you get unlimited client projects, unlimited team members, and white-label reports with your branding on shareable, client-ready audits. That is a clean fit if what you sell is the audit and the monthly deck, not ongoing content production.
The tracking is genuinely deep. You get mention and citation presence by engine, share of voice prompt by prompt with competitors side by side, and a "fan-out" view that surfaces the follow-up queries each AI runs internally before answering. It also scores every domain cited in the client's niche by frequency and impact, with a market price next to each one, so you can show a client exactly where to earn the next mention. Pro and Agency tiers add MCP integration, which lets you plug the data into your own AI workflows.
Key features to know:
- Native white-label reports with your agency branding on the Agency tier.
- Seven engines across all paid plans (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overview), with an eighth (Grok) described on the Agency landing page.
- Fan-out query capture and source authority scoring with a market price per domain.
- Credit-based scans: 5,000 monthly credits on Agency, with overage billed at €0.02 per scan.
- A 4-day free trial on every paid plan, no credit card to start.
One honest limitation. There is no content production module, so the article that closes the gap is still your team's job. Credit-based pricing can also surprise you when you run page audits, Reddit engagement, and fan-out capture across many clients at once. And pricing is in euros, which US-based agencies should factor in. If your deliverable is the report, this is a strong pick. If it is the report and the content, you will be bolting a writing workflow onto it.
3. Otterly.AI
Best for agencies whose reporting already runs on Looker Studio and who want pitch workspaces and a partner-directory listing to help win new business.
Otterly.AI markets itself as the AI search monitoring platform built for modern marketing agencies. Its Agency Partner Program layers on top of the Standard or Premium plan rather than being separate billing, and it adds the things that help you sell: pitch workspaces where you build a custom audit for a prospect before they sign, a listing in the partner directory as a GEO specialist, co-marketing, and a single invoice across all client workspaces.
The monitoring covers mention tracking, link citation tracking, a brand visibility index, domain ranking, and a GEO audit that scores the AI-readiness of a client's own pages. Reporting flows through a Google Looker Studio connector, so if your client decks already live there, the setup will feel familiar.
Key features to know:
- Agency Partner Program: unlimited workspaces, pitch environments, partner-directory listing, single invoice.
- Four base engines on every self-serve plan: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot.
- Claude, Google AI Mode, and Gemini available as paid add-ons.
- GEO audit that scores each client page's AI readiness.
- Looker Studio connector for branded reporting; unlimited team members on Standard and Premium.
One honest limitation. Only four engines come in the base plan, and full coverage means paying for add-on engines that a third-party review places at $9 to $149 per engine per month, which adds up at agency scale. White-label runs through Looker Studio templates rather than native branded PDFs, so you build the template once. There is no content production module either. If you are already standardized on Looker Studio and want pitch workspaces for new business, Otterly is a comfortable home. If you want branded PDFs out of the box, look at Mentionable instead.
4. Profound
Best for agencies whose clients demand the widest engine coverage, need multi-region or multi-language tracking, or want AI-crawler attribution to justify the spend to a CFO.
Profound is the broadest-coverage, most enterprise-leaning tool in this roundup. It names ten engines, including ones the others do not touch: alongside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot, it tracks Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek, Amazon Rufus, and Google AI Overviews. Its Agency Mode gives you a central dashboard for client workspaces, per-client brand configuration, pitch environments for prospects, and subscription management across accounts.
What sets Profound apart is Agent Analytics, which tracks which AI crawlers visit a client's site and what content they consume. That lets you tie AEO work to attributable traffic, which is a powerful thing to put in front of a client's finance team. Its Answer Engine Insights module also reports a labeled sentiment signal alongside mentions, citations, share of voice, and position.
Key features to know:
- Ten named engines, the broadest set here, including Amazon Rufus, Meta AI, DeepSeek, and Grok.
- Agency Mode: central client dashboard, per-workspace brand config, pitch environments.
- Agent Analytics: which AI crawlers visit and consume a client's content, tied to traffic.
- Multi-region and multi-language support for international rosters.
- Integrations including GA4, Google Cloud, AWS, Cloudflare, and WordPress, with CSV, JSON, and API reporting.
One honest limitation. It is the most expensive tool here at the agency-shaped tier, and public pricing is gated behind a demo form, which slows procurement. There is no native white-label PDF report, so reporting comes as CSV, JSON, or API that you turn into a deliverable in your own BI tool, and the content production side is lighter than DeepSmith's. If your clients genuinely need ten engines and crawler-level attribution, Profound earns its price. If they do not, you are paying for coverage you will not report on.
How to choose the right tool for your agency
You do not need the tool with the most features. You need the one that matches how you deliver. Let's make this simple.
Choose DeepSmith if your deliverable is not just a report but the content that closes the gap the report reveals. Each client gets an isolated workspace with its own voice, products, and personas, and the same data that finds the gap produces the article to win it back. This is the best fit when you want monitoring and production under one login.
Choose Mentionable if the report is the product. You get native branded PDFs and client-ready audits out of the box at a flat €299/mo, with unlimited users and no per-seat cost. It is the cleanest fit for white-label AI brand monitoring where the monthly audit is the deliverable.
Choose Otterly.AI if your reporting already lives in Looker Studio, you want pitch workspaces to help close new logos, and the base four engines cover what your clients care about. Just budget for add-on engines if a client needs the full list.
Choose Profound if your clients demand the widest engine coverage, run in multiple regions or languages, or need AI-crawler attribution to prove the work to a CFO. It is built for the enterprise end, and priced for it.
Still unsure? Start with the deliverable your clients actually pay for. If it is content, start with DeepSmith. If it is the report alone, start with Mentionable. You can always layer a second tool later for a client with unusual engine needs.
Package it, price it, and start this week
Here is the good news: you have already done the hardest part, which was realizing this is now table stakes. The next step is small. Pick the one tool that matches your deliverable, set up a single client, and produce one report you would be proud to send. That is your proof of concept and your first case study, both at once.
If your service includes content, the fastest way to see the whole loop is to watch a single client's gap turn into a finished, on-brand article. DeepSmith offers a 7-day free trial with real data and real drafts, so you can start a free trial and try it on one account before you commit. One client, one report, one article. Momentum matters more than perfection.



