Conductor and Evertune both track brand visibility in AI answers, but they differ in what comes next. Conductor ties tracking to SEO data, MCP and API access, SOC 2 and a free trial, with no public prices. Evertune samples each prompt repeatedly and links gaps to affiliate and ad placements, but has no SOC 2 report yet and no trial. DeepSmith is a strong alternative for teams that would rather close gaps with owned content, because it tracks and publishes from one self-serve platform.
Teams that buy media as well as publish content have a slightly different question than most. Both tools measure AI visibility, so the real decision is what happens after the gap shows up: more content, more ad spend, or both. This Conductor vs Evertune AI visibility and ads comparison goes through pricing, features and security, and it also looks at where DeepSmith fits for teams that want to close gaps with pages they own. If you searched for Evertune vs Conductor because a media buyer and a content lead are on the same shortlist, the sections below split the decision along those two jobs.
Conductor vs Evertune: the short answer
- Choose DeepSmith if you want AI tracking and publish-ready content on one public plan, from $99 a month, with a 7-day trial and SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certification.
- Choose Conductor if AI visibility needs to sit next to keyword, analytics and site monitoring data, and your procurement team can work with a sales-led, credit-based contract.
- Choose Evertune if you also buy affiliate or programmatic media and want visibility gaps to point at those placements, and you can accept no trial and no SOC 2 report for now.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | DeepSmith | Conductor | Evertune |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price (monthly) | $99/mo (Pro) | Not published | $800/mo (Pro, demo request) |
| Annual price | $80/mo billed yearly | Not published | Not listed |
| Prompts at entry tier | 50 | Not published (2,500 AI Search credits a year) | 100,000 |
| Engines at entry tier | ChatGPT | Not published | 11 AI models listed, split by plan not published |
| Most engines on any plan | 10 (Enterprise) | 8 | 11 (Claude, Meta AI and DeepSeek base-model only) |
| Free trial | Yes, 7 days | Yes, 3 weeks, no card | No |
| Citation tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Content generation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| CMS publishing | Yes | No | No |
| Paid placements from visibility gaps | - | Not listed | Yes, ChatGPT ads in beta |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Not listed |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes | Not listed |
| Security certifications | Yes (SOC 2, GDPR, ISO) | Yes (SOC 2 Type II) | No SOC 2 report yet |
| Review rating | 4.8/5 on G2 | 4.5/5 on G2 | Unrated on G2 |
Pricing and features as of September 2026, from each vendor's site and public reviews.
Conductor
Conductor is an enterprise SEO and AEO platform founded in 2006. It sells four connected products: Intelligence for AI and keyword visibility, Creator for drafting and scoring, Monitoring for 24/7 technical checks, and AgentStack for the MCP server, API and agents. It is built for large, often multi-site teams that want AI visibility reporting in the same system as their other search data.
The standout is that connection. Page-level citations, AI referral sessions and conversions through Google Analytics 4, and keyword rankings sit in the same reports. Security is also a strength, with SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 listed in its Security Center.
The real limits are on the buying side. No plan has a public dollar price, and seats, prompt limits and engine access by plan are not published. Conductor also says final publishing remains in your CMS, so content leaves the platform by hand. On G2 it holds 4.5/5 from 788 reviews as of September 2026, with praise for support and complaints about price for smaller teams and a learning curve.
Evertune
Evertune is a New York AI search marketing platform founded in 2024 by early team members of The Trade Desk. It measures how AI models mention and rank a brand, then connects the gaps to content, site fixes, affiliate placements and ads. It is aimed at mid-market and enterprise brands, and the agencies serving them, that also buy media.
The standout is how it measures. Evertune says it asks each prompt 100 times per model and reports a margin of error of about 1 point overall and 2 at topic level, and it separates base-model answers from consumer-app answers. Its prompts come from EverPanel, a consumer panel it describes as holding more than 150 million prompts.
The limits show up in procurement. Both plans say "Request a demo," there is no free plan or trial, and Evertune's own January 2026 comparison page describes SOC 2 Type II as in progress. Its ChatGPT Ads Manager and AI Retargeting are still in beta. G2 showed zero reviews on the day it was checked, so there is little independent feedback to read.
DeepSmith: the alternative that closes gaps with owned content
Both Conductor and Evertune are good at showing where a brand is missing from AI answers. The difference for a team that buys media is what each one does with that finding. Evertune points it at affiliate and ad placements. Conductor points it at its writing assistant and then hands the draft to your CMS. In both cases someone still has to turn the gap into a published page.
DeepSmith puts that step in the same platform. AI visibility tracking reports mention rate, citation rate and share of voice, and shows which of your pages AI actually cites. Opportunity Agents turn those gaps into ideas that each carry the data point behind them. The Writer then produces a finished, brand-grounded article, with internal and external links, a cover image and metadata. From Produced Content you publish straight to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity or Contentful, or to your own webhooks. The Apps Library repurposes each article for LinkedIn, X, newsletters and other channels.
Paid placements are not part of DeepSmith, so the money goes into pages you keep rather than ad spend that stops when the budget does. Deep IQ stores your brand voice, products and personas once, so every article is written against the same context.
Pricing is public. Pro is $99 a month, Grow is $199, Scale is $399, and Enterprise is custom, with annual billing lowering each rate. There is a 7-day free trial and no long-term contract. DeepSmith is SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certified and rated 4.8/5 on G2.
Engine coverage and data method
Evertune has the wider engine list on paper, and Conductor has the clearer one. Evertune lists 11 AI models, but its help center says Claude, Meta AI and DeepSeek are sampled only through their base models, and Perplexity and Copilot only as consumer apps. It does not track Grok. Conductor tracks eight engines, including ChatGPT in Auto and Search modes, Grok and Claude, and it says it collects answers through official engine APIs wherever possible.
The data method is the bigger difference. Evertune's 100 samples per prompt are meant to smooth out the way AI answers vary from one run to the next. Conductor lets you set a daily, weekly or monthly cadence per topic, and each run uses credits.
What DeepSmith does: it tracks ten engines, with ChatGPT on Pro, Perplexity added on Grow, Gemini on Scale and all ten on Enterprise. Each tracked prompt keeps its full answer history, so you can read what the engines actually said over time.
Tracking depth and reporting
The verdict here depends on whether you value reporting breadth or measurement volume.
Conductor goes deeper on how visibility connects to the rest of search, and Evertune goes deeper on prompt discovery and demand. Conductor reports mentions, citations, sentiment, share of voice and fan-out queries, and ties them to AI referral traffic and conversions. Its pages do not describe tracking where the brand ranks inside an answer.
Evertune tracks answer position with its AI Brand Score, adds shopping tracking for ChatGPT, and sizes prompt demand from EverPanel. It does not describe referral or conversion attribution, full answer storage or fan-out queries. For a team that has to show leadership what AI traffic did, Conductor's analytics link is the easier story to tell. For a team that wants to know how stable a visibility score is, Evertune's repeated sampling is the more careful method.
What DeepSmith does: its overview reports mention rate, citation rate and share of voice with trends, and its Pages view shows which of your pages AI cites and the prompts driving those citations, so the report points straight at the page to improve.
Pricing and buying process
Evertune is clearer on price, and Conductor is clearer on how to try it. Evertune lists Pro at $800 a month with 100,000 tracked prompts and 25 articles a month, but only after a demo request, and it does not say whether that is billed month to month. Ad management adds a usage fee as a percentage of ChatGPT ad spend, with the rate set on the order page. Conductor publishes no prices at all, packages AI tracking as yearly credits, and offers a three-week trial without a card.
Credit costs vary by engine. Conductor's documented costs range from 0.1 credit per response for Google AI Overviews to 2 for ChatGPT Search and Gemini, so the number of answers you can track depends on your engine mix. Its US terms describe noncancellable, prepaid order forms that renew automatically unless you give 90 days' notice.
What DeepSmith does: it lists four plans with fixed monthly allowances of articles, tracked prompts and seats, so you can work out cost before talking to anyone. Pro includes 20 articles and 50 tracked prompts for $99 a month, and there are no cancellation fees.
Security and procurement
Conductor is the safer pick for a security review today. It lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001, SAML SSO on Growth and Enterprise, and documents on request. Evertune lists SSO on Enterprise only, and public evidence did not confirm a SOC 2 report, ISO certification, GDPR assurances or data residency. That does not prove a control is missing, so ask for current documents before ruling it out.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith is SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certified, and a team can start on a self-serve trial and check the setup before a procurement process begins.
Developer access and data connections
Conductor wins this one clearly. Its MCP server is included on all three plans, with official apps in ChatGPT, Claude and Microsoft Copilot, plus a Data API, Content API and Monitoring Reporting API. Analytics connectors cover Google Analytics, Search Console and Adobe Analytics.
Evertune's pages describe no customer API, MCP server, BI connector or alert channel. Its integrations are on the activation side, such as impact.com, PartnerStack, The Trade Desk, Index Exchange and a connected OpenAI Ads account.
What DeepSmith does: it offers a read-only REST API, a 23-tool MCP server that works with Claude, Cursor, VS Code and other assistants, and signed webhooks for content status changes, so your own systems can react when an article is ready.
From insight to action
Evertune wins on paid activation, and Conductor wins on content that stays in your own hands. Evertune's Partner Connect maps cited sources to affiliate networks and programmatic platforms, and its Ads Manager builds ChatGPT campaigns from visibility gaps. Both ad modules are described as beta, and fees depend on order pages. For a team that already buys affiliate or programmatic media, that link between a gap and a placement is the reason to shortlist Evertune.
Conductor turns recommendations into briefs and drafts inside Writing Assistant, with 60 drafts a year on Essentials and 180 on Growth. It says every draft should be reviewed by people, and publishing stays in your CMS.
Evertune's Content Studio writes full blog drafts, 25 a month on Pro, but exports them as Markdown or HTML and names no CMS connector.
What DeepSmith does: it takes a gap from tracking to a published page without leaving the platform. Opportunity Agents propose the idea with its evidence, the Writer produces the article, Autowrite can generate it on a scheduled date, and Produced Content publishes it to your CMS. The Apps Library then repurposes it, so one finding becomes an article and a set of channel posts.
Which should you choose
- DeepSmith: teams that want to see where they are missing in AI answers and close those gaps with published, on-brand content, on a public plan with a 7-day trial and SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certification.
- Conductor: enterprise SEO and content teams that run several sites, want AI visibility alongside keyword and technical monitoring data, and have a buying process that handles quotes and credit contracts.
- Evertune: mid-market and enterprise brands that also buy affiliate or programmatic media, want repeated sampling and a path from visibility gaps to paid placements, and can work without a trial or SOC 2 report for now.
If you are choosing between Evertune vs Conductor for an enterprise team that buys ads, the deciding questions are where the gap should be closed and how much security review you must pass. Conductor is the stronger answer on security, and Evertune is the stronger answer on paid activation. DeepSmith covers the content half on its own.
Try DeepSmith free
Start a 7-day trial and see your AI visibility gaps next to the content that closes them. Start your free trial.
