Foglift Alternatives: 8 Best AI Visibility Scanners for 2026

You ran the scan. You got a score. Then what?

That is the moment most teams get stuck. A one-time audit tells you how ready your pages are for AI search today. It does not tell you which prompts name your brand next week, which of your pages ChatGPT actually cites, or which competitor is quietly taking your spot. So you are here looking at Foglift alternatives, hoping for something that keeps watching after the scan ends.

Good news: that market grew up fast. There are now real options that track your visibility on a schedule, break it down by engine, and show you the exact pages winning citations.

This guide walks through eight of them. You will see what each one measures, what it costs, who it fits, and one honest limitation. No hype. Just the details you need to shortlist two or three and book demos.

Take a breath. You only need to pick one tool this quarter, and by the end of this page you will know which two are worth your time.

How we picked these Foglift alternatives

The best Foglift alternatives are not the same tool for every team, so start with the bar rather than the ranking. Every product here had to clear all four of these.

1. Recurring monitoring, not a one-off scan. The tool has to re-check your prompts on a schedule and keep the history. One-time audit products were excluded on purpose.

2. Real diagnostics. Some mix of visibility, mentions, citations, position, sentiment, share of voice, sources, or competitor gaps. A single number with nothing under it does not help you act.

3. Reporting and team fit. Exports, dashboards, API access, seats, and whether an agency or a solo marketer can actually live in it.

4. A path to action. Finding the gap is step one. Closing it is the job. Tools that help you do something with the finding scored higher.

One caution before the list. Scores are not standardized. Foglift's AI Readiness score runs 0 to 100 and describes whether engines can parse and cite your content. Other tools report visibility scores, position, citation rate, or share of voice, all built on different inputs. When you compare foglift.io competitors, compare the underlying metric, not the label on the dial.

Quick comparison of the best Foglift alternatives

Here is the shortlist at a glance. Prices are public-page snapshots for 2026 and can change, so confirm before you buy.

1. DeepSmith

Best for: marketing leads who need to see AI-search gaps and turn them into on-brand, publish-ready articles without moving findings into a separate writing workflow.

Most tools on this list stop at the dashboard. You get a clear chart showing you are losing share of voice, and then you open a blank doc. DeepSmith closes that loop inside one platform: it measures where you show up in AI answers, finds the gaps, and produces the content that fills them, all off the same data.

What it measures. Mention rate, citation rate, share of voice, sentiment, and visibility trend. Underneath those, you get per-prompt mention and citation rates with full answer history, so you can read the actual answer an engine gave. Pages shows which of your URLs AI cites and what share of your citations each one earns. Competitor citations shows who wins your prompts and on exactly which pages. Discover Prompts builds a starter tracking set from your product, persona, and buyer-stage context, so you are not staring at an empty prompt list on day one.

Engine coverage. Ten engines are covered across tiers: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Grok, Meta AI, Microsoft Copilot, and DeepSeek. Pro tracks ChatGPT. Grow adds Perplexity. Scale adds Gemini. Enterprise and Custom cover all ten.

The action layer. This is where the entry earns its spot. Content Map crawls your site and unlimited competitor sites, sorts every page onto one shared topic taxonomy and funnel stage, then flags coverage gaps and untapped topics. Sitemaps refresh every 24 hours, so the map stays current without a re-import.

Opportunity Agents read that data and hand back content ideas with the evidence attached. Not a brainstorm. The specific data point that justifies the idea travels with it, which is what lets you defend a backlog in a planning meeting instead of guessing.

Then Content Studio takes it home. New Ideas holds the backlog, Planned Content schedules it, and the Writer turns one planned idea into a researched, publish-ready article with SEO and AEO structure, internal and external links, a cover image, and metadata. The pipeline places up to five internal links on its own. Autowrite runs the whole thing on a scheduled date with nobody in the app. Produced Content publishes straight to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity, or Contentful, or to your own webhooks.

Deep IQ is the reason the output sounds like you. Your positioning, products, personas, brand voice, visual guidelines, and content types are stored once as structured context, and every run is grounded in it. Repurpose and the Apps Library then turn each finished article into LinkedIn, X, Medium, Substack, newsletter, Reddit, and other channel-native versions.

Pricing.

There is a 7-day free trial with real data and real drafts, no long-term contracts, and no cancellation fees. Enterprise adds 1:1 onboarding and a dedicated account manager.

One honest limitation. Engine coverage climbs with the tier, so a team that needs all ten engines on day one is looking at Enterprise rather than Pro. That is worth knowing up front, and it is stated plainly on the pricing page rather than buried in a quote. For most teams the practical answer is simpler than it sounds: start where your buyers actually ask their questions, then widen. If you only want a visibility dashboard and have your writing handled elsewhere, a specialist tracker below will serve you fine.

2. OtterlyAI

Best for: solo marketers, small teams, and agencies that want frequent prompt monitoring with strong reporting.

OtterlyAI runs your defined conversational prompts across AI engines and reports which brands get cited, how often, in what context, and against which competitors. Dashboards cover brand coverage rate, share of AI voice, platform visibility, trends, sentiment, referenced links, a Brand Visibility Index, domain ranking, link citation analysis, and a generative engine optimization audit.

Key features. Daily tracking, competitive reports, alerts when mentions change, detailed exports, and a public API for brand reports, prompts, citations, and workspace data. Standard and Premium add API and MCP access, a Google Looker Studio connector, and Agent Analytics.

Pricing. Lite is $29/month with 15 prompts and 1,000 GEO audits. Standard is $189/month with 100 prompts, unlimited workspaces, and 5,000 GEO URL audits. Premium is $489/month with 400 prompts and 10,000 audits. Enterprise is custom, with one display starting at $1,000/month. Annual billing is marked 15% off, and a free trial is offered.

Limitation. Prompt capacity is the real constraint at 15, 100, or 400 on the self-serve tiers. The core engines included are ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot, while Claude, Google AI Mode, and Gemini appear as add-ons on the pricing display. Check the final engine mix before you compare monthly prices, because the sticker price and the delivered coverage are two different things.

3. Peec AI

Best for: marketing teams that want daily analytics, competitor benchmarking, and client-ready reporting across countries.

Peec measures visibility, position, share of voice, mentions, impressions, sentiment, sources, and citations, then benchmarks you against named competitors. It surfaces the sources feeding AI answers, including places like G2, LinkedIn, Reddit, and news sites, which is useful when your problem is off-domain rather than on your blog.

Key features. Daily tracking across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, and Gemini by default, with more model options as an add-on. CSV export, Looker Studio, an API, and a Peec AI MCP server.

Pricing. Starter is $95/month with 50 prompts and one project. Pro is $245/month with 150 prompts and two projects. Advanced is $495/month with 350 prompts, five projects, and multi-country tracking. All three include unlimited users and let you choose three models. Enterprise is custom. Annual billing saves roughly 15%. The public pricing card can render dynamically, so confirm the current figures.

Limitation. Plans constrain prompts, projects, and selected models. Peec's own material notes that mentions, impressions, and sentiment are hard things to measure, so treat the numbers as a consistent sample rather than ground truth. It is an analytics product, not a production workflow, so your writing still happens somewhere else.

4. Profound

Best for: enterprise brands that need answer-engine intelligence, crawler analytics, and traffic attribution.

Profound goes deep on the intelligence side. Answer Engine Insights sets a baseline for visibility score, share of voice, and average position, then organizes tracked prompts into topics, estimates topic search volume, and ranks your visibility by topic. The Citations dashboard shows how often engines link to your site and which domains and pages are the top sources.

Key features. Query Fanouts exposes prompt variations with count and share metrics. Prompt Volumes shows what people actually ask AI. Agent Analytics tracks how AI crawlers access and interpret your site, and can expose AI-referred traffic. The platform also covers sentiment, content AEO, and action areas including outreach and content optimization.

Pricing. Starter is $99/month billed yearly with 50 prompts and ChatGPT only. Growth is $399/month billed yearly with 100 prompts, three answer engines, and 400 Agent credits per month. Enterprise is custom with a tailored prompt plan and up to nine answer engines on the pricing display. A free trial is offered on Growth, though its length is not publicly stated.

Limitation. Starter and Growth are much narrower than Enterprise on prompts, engines, and credits, and several limits, contract terms, and integration entitlements are not publicly stated. The packaging is also described differently across pages, so get plan-level coverage in writing. If you are a small team hunting for a low-cost scanner, this is not the shape of product you are looking for.

5. Scrunch

Best for: teams that want AI-search monitoring sitting next to website auditing and content delivery to AI agents.

Scrunch treats AI search as a customer experience problem, not just a reporting one. It monitors prompt results, authoritative citations, and brand performance over time. AI Search Trends tracks approximate prompt volumes and brand presence. The Agent Experience Platform spans visibility monitoring, website auditing, content optimization, and AI-optimized content delivery meant to help agents understand and recommend you.

Key features. Prompt, persona, and competitor identification, the sites shaping AI answers, site audits, and a data API.

Pricing. Core is $250/month with five user licenses, 125 unique prompts, four LLMs, five site audits per month, one brand workspace, one country, three personas, two languages, five competitors, and three AI Search Trends topics. Core's engines are ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Copilot. Enterprise is custom and expands to nine LLMs plus custom limits everywhere. Core has a 7-day free trial with no credit card.

Limitation. Core excludes a long list: AXP, Looker Studio, the Query API, MCP, CLI, advanced API, enterprise SSO, and a dedicated account team. Countries, personas, languages, and competitors are all capped at one small number each. For a multi-market program, Enterprise is the honest comparison, and that price is custom.

6. LLMrefs

Best for: teams that want broad engine coverage and a recurring tracker at the lowest published entry price here.

LLMrefs measures brand visibility, share of voice, citations, rankings, mentions, and sources across AI search engines. You add topics and keywords, and it expands them into prompt templates like best-tool, comparison, alternative, and how-to queries, then runs those across engines daily.

Key features. Top brands by topic, citation and domain extraction where available, dashboards, exportable reports, and change notifications. Geo-targeting spans more than 50 countries and 20 languages. There is also an AI crawlability checker, a Reddit threads finder, and an LLMs.txt generator.

Pricing. One plan, All in One, at $79/month. It includes 500 prompts for mentions, sources, and fan-out queries, unlimited projects, domains, and team members, plus CSV export and API. All engines are included without extra fees, named as ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, and Meta AI.

Limitation. The stated report refresh is weekly, which is slower than the daily products above. If you need to catch a citation drop within hours, this is the wrong shape. The keyword limit is also not publicly stated, so ask.

7. AthenaHQ

Best for: commercial and enterprise teams that need AI visibility tied to traffic, conversions, and revenue.

If your CFO asks what AI visibility is worth, this is the entry to look at. Athena tracks visibility across major AI platforms with prompt-level monitoring, citations, competitor benchmarks, citation sources, citation gaps, mention rate, and citation rate. AthenaHQ Content identifies citation gaps and recommends on-page and off-page actions.

Key features. Executive dashboards with ROI tracking and board-ready reporting. Native Google Analytics and GA4 integrations connect visibility to traffic and conversions, and a Shopify integration attributes AI-search visibility to revenue. Search Console, Webflow, Framer, Tableau, Power BI, and Looker are also listed.

Pricing. Essential is free with $25 in credit and 300 credits, covering ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Copilot. Starter is $295/month with $300 in monthly credit, 3,600 credits, unlimited members, and ten named models. Enterprise is custom and adds the Athena Citation Engine and Recommendation Engine. One credit equals one AI response.

Limitation. The credit model makes prompt volume hard to compare against prompt-based plans, and you cannot convert credits into prompts without the vendor defining it. Tracking cadence is not publicly stated, and API access plus extra credits are paid add-ons. For a small content team wanting a simple scanner, the free tier is a fine trial and the paid step up is steep.

8. Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Best for: teams already paying for Semrush who want AI visibility beside their existing SEO data.

The pitch here is not depth, it is proximity. Your AI visibility numbers live next to the keyword, backlink, and Google Analytics data your team already opens every morning, which removes an entire tool from the stack conversation.

Key features. Reports include Visibility Overview, Competitor Research, Prompt Research, Brand Performance, Prompt Tracking, and an AI Search Site Audit. Metrics cover AI visibility score, share of voice, mentions, citations, sentiment, topic-level volume, difficulty, and intent. Competitor Research compares you with up to four competitors, and source analysis identifies your most-cited pages and the topics driving mentions. AI referral traffic and conversions come through Google Analytics.

Pricing. $99/month for the toolkit. The documented plan includes one folder, one domain for Brand Performance, 300 daily AI Analysis queries, and 1,000 daily Prompt Research queries. There is no free trial for the toolkit.

Limitation. One folder and one domain rules out agencies and multi-brand teams straight away. Reports update weekly, competitor comparisons cap at four, and the documented toolkit page lists a narrower platform set than the broader Semrush feature docs, so confirm coverage for the exact plan you buy.

Where Foglift itself fits

Short version, because the job here is comparing substitutes rather than reviewing Foglift.

Foglift's AI Readiness score is a 0 to 100 signal for whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overview can parse and cite your content. Foglift pricing starts at a free plan with 200 tokens per month and weekly Perplexity visibility. Launch is $49/month with 4,000 tokens and daily monitoring across five engines. Growth is $129/month with 11,500 tokens and twice-daily monitoring across all engines. Enterprise is custom with hourly monitoring. Technical audits, the readiness score, content briefs, AI crawler analytics, audit history, and PDF reports are listed as included at zero token cost.

So on price alone, Foglift sits low. That is real, and it is why people like it. The reason buyers go looking for alternatives to Foglift is usually not price. It is that a readiness score answers "can engines read my page" while the harder question is "which prompts name my competitor instead of me, and what do I publish about it this month."

Do not assume the other tools use the same 0 to 100 scale. They mostly do not.

How to choose your Foglift alternative

Skip the feature matrix for a second. Start with your actual situation.

Choose DeepSmith when you want measurement feeding a production system: evidence-backed ideas, topic and competitor gaps, scheduled writing, stored brand context, internal links, metadata, CMS publishing, and distribution assets.

Choose OtterlyAI when daily monitoring, alerts, API and MCP access, and GEO audit volume matter more than article production. Price the extra engines first.

Choose Peec AI when daily multi-country analytics, model comparisons, and Looker Studio or CSV reporting are the center of the job.

Choose Profound when you need enterprise answer-engine intelligence, topic demand data, and AI-crawler behavior in one place.

Choose Scrunch when site audits, AI Search Trends, and agent delivery belong in the same program and the budget supports it.

Choose LLMrefs when broad model coverage and a simple $79 entry matter more than daily refresh.

Choose AthenaHQ when Shopify or GA4 revenue attribution is a hard requirement and your team can manage credits.

Choose Semrush when you already pay for Semrush and want AI visibility next to your SEO data.

Whichever two you shortlist, run the same buyer questions through both. Does it measure mentions, links, or both? How often does it refresh? How many prompts or credits do you get at the engine coverage you actually need? Are AI Mode and AI Overviews separate line items? Which exports, APIs, and SSO are in the quoted tier?

One more thing that catches people out. A tool showing a visibility change does not prove your edit caused it. Give any change a few cycles before you call it a win or a failure.

Start with the gap, not the dashboard

Here is the part worth sitting with. Every tool on this list will tell you that you are invisible for a prompt that matters. Only some of them help you do anything about it.

If you are a small team and the writing is already the bottleneck, buying a second dashboard just moves the pile. Pick the tool that turns the finding into a scheduled article, and your Monday looks different.

Ready to see your own numbers instead of someone else's screenshots? Start a 7-day DeepSmith free trial and get real data and real drafts before you pay.