Peec AI vs Ahrefs Brand Radar: Pricing for Daily Tracking vs a Monthly Index

Peec AI sells daily tracking of a prompt list you choose, starting at $95 a month with a free trial. Ahrefs Brand Radar sells access to a pre-collected prompt index at $199 per index, refreshed monthly, with no free trial. Peec AI suits teams that want daily numbers on their own prompts, and Ahrefs Brand Radar suits teams that want to look up any brand without setup. DeepSmith is a strong alternative when the budget should also buy the articles that close the gaps, because it tracks and writes on one plan.

If you are choosing between Peec AI or Ahrefs Brand Radar, the first thing to know is that the two prices buy different things. Peec AI charges for prompts you pick, checked every day. Ahrefs Brand Radar charges for access to a large index of prompts it collected for you, plus a separate allowance for your own. This page walks through what each price covers, where the features differ, and which setup fits a monthly budget. DeepSmith comes in as a third option for teams that also need to publish.

Peec AI vs Ahrefs Brand Radar: the short answer

• Choose DeepSmith if you want AI visibility tracking and publish-ready articles on one self-serve plan, from $99 a month, with a 7-day free trial.
• Choose Peec AI if you want daily tracking of 50 to 350 prompts of your own on a published price, starting at $95 a month, and you will do the content work yourself.
• Choose Ahrefs Brand Radar if you want to research any brand against a pre-collected index of 448M+ prompts without building a list first, and you can pay $199 per index or $699 for all of them.

Pricing and features as of September 2026, from each vendor's site and public reviews.

Peec AI

Peec AI is an AI search analytics tool from Berlin, founded in January 2025. It runs the prompts you track through AI engines once every 24 hours, mostly by scraping their consumer interfaces, and reports visibility, position, sentiment, share of voice and the sources each answer cites. It is built for SEO, content and marketing teams, and for agencies that run several client brands.

Brand plans are Starter at $95 a month, Pro at $245 and Advanced at $495, with Enterprise on custom pricing. Starter covers 50 prompts and Advanced covers 350, all with unlimited users. Most modules sit in the entry plan, including prompt suggestions, source analytics, query fan-outs, AI shopping, an ads library, recommended actions and an MCP server.

The standout is how much is included at the low end. The real limitation is model choice. Starter, Pro and Advanced each pick three active models, Perplexity costs extra, and Claude, Grok and DeepSeek appear on Enterprise. Peec AI also does not write content, and its own pages say you create it yourself. Reviewers on G2 give it 4.8/5 from 20 reviews as of late September 2026, and they praise the interface, quick setup and support. That is a small sample, so I would treat it as a good early sign and not a settled verdict.

Ahrefs Brand Radar

Ahrefs Brand Radar is the AI visibility module of the Ahrefs marketing platform, from Singapore. It pairs two datasets. The AI Visibility Index holds pre-collected answers for 448M+ prompts drawn from Ahrefs' keyword data, across Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot. Custom Prompts track questions you choose, daily, weekly or monthly, and add Claude.

It is built for SEO and marketing teams, especially existing Ahrefs users and established brands with real search demand. The standout is instant research. You can look up any brand, product or category without writing a prompt list, with history back to 2025, and mentions can be weighted by Google search volume.

The real limitation is that the broad index is refreshed monthly on a 90-day window, so it is not live, and each index is priced separately. Ahrefs also states that it offers no free trials. Its pages do not describe content writing, a native sentiment score or a position-in-answer metric for Brand Radar. The G2 rating of 4.5/5 from 717 reviews covers the whole Ahrefs suite and not Brand Radar alone, so it says little about this module. One Brand Radar reviewer reported that retrospective index updates changed historical numbers, which is a single report.

DeepSmith: the alternative that tracks and writes

Peec AI and Ahrefs Brand Radar are both measurement tools. Peec AI states that you create the content yourself, and Ahrefs lists its content tools, such as AI Content Helper, as a separate Content Kit add-on from $99 a month, outside Brand Radar. So the budget on either page ends at the data, and the work of turning a gap into an article is paid for somewhere else.

DeepSmith puts both halves on one plan. It tracks how AI engines answer the questions you define, using mention rate, citation rate and share of voice, and shows which of your pages get cited and which competitor pages win. Opportunity Agents then read that data and return content ideas, each carrying the data point that justifies it. The Writer turns a planned idea into a finished article that is researched, linked internally and externally, and has a cover image and publish-ready metadata. Deep IQ keeps your company, product, persona and voice context so each article is grounded in the same brand facts. Autowrite can produce an article on a set date without anyone in the app, and Produced Content publishes straight to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity or Contentful.

Plans are public. Pro is $99 a month ($80 billed annually) with 50 tracked prompts, 20 articles and ChatGPT tracking. Grow is $199 ($160 annually) with 100 prompts, 40 articles and Perplexity added. Scale is $399 ($299 annually) with 200 prompts, 90 articles and Gemini added, and Enterprise is custom across all ten engines. There is a 7-day free trial and no long-term contract. DeepSmith is rated 4.8/5 on G2, and it holds SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certification.

Pricing and value

On Peec AI vs Ahrefs Brand Radar pricing, Peec AI wins for daily tracking of a prompt list you choose, because it starts at $95 a month against $199 per index for Ahrefs Brand Radar.

The two prices are built differently. Peec AI counts answers: monthly answers equal tracked prompts times active models times days, so 50 prompts on 3 models for 30 days is 4,500 answers, which is the Starter allowance. Ahrefs counts checks, where one check is one prompt run on one engine in one location. Its custom prompt packages are Basic at $50 for 2,500 checks, Growth at $100 for 7,000 and Scale at $250 for 25,000, with overage between $0.010 and $0.020 a check. By my arithmetic both work out to about two cents per answer at the entry level, so the real difference is what sits around the checks.

At Peec AI, the $95 also covers the dashboards, source analytics and actions. At Ahrefs, the broad index is the $199 or $699 part, and custom prompts are a separate purchase unless you already pay for an Ahrefs plan, where Lite at $129 includes 150 checks a month, about 5 daily prompts. Annual billing at Peec AI takes 15 percent off, which puts Starter near $80 a month. Ahrefs does not list annual prices for Brand Radar.

Trials matter for a monthly budget too. Ahrefs offers none, and its free AI Visibility Checker gives a one-time top-5 preview, so you pay before you see your own data. Peec AI offers a self-serve free trial, though its pages do not state how long it runs.

What DeepSmith does: it puts tracking and writing on one price. Pro at $99 includes 50 tracked prompts and 20 articles a month, so a team that would otherwise pay a tracker and then pay writers or a second tool covers both from the same plan, and the 7-day trial lets you check the data and the drafts before paying.

Tracking depth and data method

Peec AI wins on tracking depth for the prompts you choose, because it checks each one daily on every active model and reports position and sentiment alongside visibility.

Peec AI measures visibility as the share of answers that mention the brand, average rank when mentioned, a sentiment score from 0 to 100, and share of voice against competitors. It stores the raw answers in a Chats table and shows the sub-searches engines ran before answering. Ahrefs Brand Radar measures mentions, citations, impressions weighted by search volume, and AI share of voice. Its pages do not describe a native sentiment metric or a position metric, and sentiment is offered through Letaido, a separate Ahrefs product.

The data methods differ more than the metrics do. Ahrefs builds its index from real queries in its keyword database, expands them into natural questions, and re-tests the question sets monthly. That gives you breadth and a link to search demand, and the numbers are directional. Ahrefs itself notes that its prompt sampling skews toward English and that visibility estimates are not measured referral traffic. Daily data at Ahrefs needs Custom Prompts, where Claude uses 8 checks per update.

What DeepSmith does: it checks the questions you define on a schedule and reports mention rate, citation rate, share of voice and sentiment, with full answer history for each prompt. The tracking is the base for the content decisions that follow, so each metric points at a page to write or fix.

Engine coverage

In Ahrefs Brand Radar vs Peec AI terms, Ahrefs wins on self-serve engine breadth, because its $699 all-platform purchase covers six platforms, while Peec AI's self-serve plans pick three.

Ahrefs covers AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot in the index, and Claude on custom prompts. Grok is listed in its help center, but Ahrefs says it cannot collect new Grok data for now, so I would not count it. Fan-out queries show for ChatGPT and Perplexity only.

Peec AI lets Starter, Pro and Advanced choose three active models from ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini and Naver AI. Perplexity is a paid add-on at $30, $70 or $140 a month billed annually, and Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta AI appear on Enterprise. Peec AI's strength here is the Enterprise ceiling, which its plan card puts at up to 13 models, though that sits behind a sales conversation.

For most buyers, three engines picked well will cover where their customers ask. If Perplexity or Claude matters to your audience, check the add-on cost first, because it changes the Peec AI price.

Competitor and citation analysis

Peec AI wins on built-in competitor and source analysis, because it turns the data into a gap list, while Ahrefs Brand Radar leaves more of that to manual filtering.

Both tools benchmark named competitors on the same prompts and record cited sources at domain and URL level. Both also show which of your own pages earn citations. Peec AI adds source classification (competitor, editorial, reference, user-generated), a gap analysis of sources that often name competitors but not you, and a Relative Opportunity Score on its recommended actions.

Ahrefs adds context from the rest of its platform. Cited Domains and Cited Pages work at the domain and URL level, and Search demand, Web visibility, YouTube and Reddit signals sit next to the AI numbers. Its academy walks through gap workflows by hand, and a gap analysis skill is offered through Letaido. For a team already living in Ahrefs, that surrounding data is a real draw.

What DeepSmith does: it shows who wins citations for your prompts, on which exact pages, and how each competitor performs by platform. The Content Map adds a view of the topics where competitors publish and you do not, so the competitor analysis ends in a list of pages to write.

From insight to action

Peec AI wins on guidance, since its Actions give prioritized steps, but neither tool writes the content those steps call for.

Peec AI groups cited sources into content-type clusters and returns on-page and off-page actions on every plan. Its pages say the user still creates the content, and a brief or a page rewrite happens by asking an outside assistant such as Claude through the Peec MCP server. Ahrefs Brand Radar shows mention and citation gaps through report filters, and its content tools sit in separate products.

Both vendors offer data access for your own tooling. Peec AI has an MCP server on every brand plan, CSV exports and a documented API that its docs limit to Enterprise. Ahrefs has a Brand Radar API with 21 endpoints, a Looker Studio connector from the Advanced plan, and an MCP server whose Brand Radar coverage is not stated.

What DeepSmith does: it closes the loop inside the product. Opportunity Agents return ideas with their evidence, Planned Content schedules them, the Writer produces the article, and Produced Content publishes it to your CMS. Its API and MCP server are read-only, so they feed your reporting and assistants without changing the workspace.

Which should you choose

• DeepSmith fits marketing teams that want one budget to cover tracking and production, from watching how AI engines answer to publishing the articles that fix the gaps, on public prices from $99 a month.
• Peec AI fits teams that want daily tracking on a fixed list of 50 to 350 prompts, with unlimited users, and that have writers or tools already in place for content.
• Ahrefs Brand Radar fits existing Ahrefs customers and established brands that want to research any brand against a large index, and that are comfortable paying per index with monthly refreshes.

Whether Peec AI or Ahrefs Brand Radar fits better often comes down to budget, so price your real prompt list first. A list of 50 prompts on three engines is well inside Peec AI's Starter plan, while a one-off market study across many brands is the job the Ahrefs index was built for.

Start a 7-day free trial of DeepSmith to see tracking data and a first set of drafts on your own brand.