Someone on your buyer's committee is asking ChatGPT about your category right now. Today. Maybe while you read this.
If your brand isn't in that answer, you never got a shot. No impression, no click, no chance to make your case.
That's the gap the best GEO tools for B2B are built to close. Generative engine optimization is the work of getting your brand cited inside AI-generated answers, on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Mode, when buyers ask the questions that decide your deals.
Here's the good news: this is early. The teams winning citations right now are not the ones with the biggest budgets. They're the ones who started measuring.
Feeling behind? That's normal. Most B2B marketing teams are. Let's fix it with one decision: which tool gives you the picture you're missing.
Why B2B buyers changed the rules
B2B buying moved away from vendor conversations a long time ago. Research from 2026 shows most of the buying journey now happens before anyone talks to sales, and AI assistants have become one of the strongest influences on which vendors even make a shortlist.
A large share of B2B buyers now use ChatGPT and Perplexity during purchase research. Not as a novelty. As the first step.
Google's AI Overviews have gone mainstream too, appearing on a meaningful chunk of searches worldwide, with some markets running much higher. The exact share depends on who's measuring and where, so treat it as a range rather than a hard number.
Here's what should get your attention: AI referral traffic is still small as a slice of your total sessions, but it converts far better than ordinary organic search across many B2B categories. Fewer visitors, much warmer intent. Brands that get cited in AI answers also tend to earn better clickthrough than brands that don't, even on the same results page.
The AI answer is the new first impression. If it doesn't include you, the buyer never learns you exist. That's what turned B2B AI answer optimization into a line item instead of a side project.
What separates a real GEO tool from a dashboard
Before you compare logos and price tags, get clear on the four jobs a GEO tool can do. Most tools do one or two well. Very few do all four.
Track. Measure your mentions, citations, share of voice, and prompt-level visibility across the engines your buyers actually use.
Diagnose. Attribute citations to specific pages, prompts, and competitors, so you know which assets earn their keep and which ones don't.
Prioritize. Surface the prompts and topics where closing the gap will actually move something.
Produce. Write the articles that win the citations. This is the loop most trackers skip entirely, and it's where B2B generative engine optimization usually stalls.
Notice the pattern? Jobs one through three tell you what's wrong. Job four fixes it. A dashboard that shows you 40 prompts you're losing is only useful if something downstream turns that into published work. GEO for B2B content stalls at that handoff far more often than at the diagnosis.
Worth weighing too: how often prompts get re-run, whether the tool builds your prompt set or makes you bring one, CMS publishing, multi-workspace support if you run several brands, brand-voice grounding, and security posture if procurement gets involved.
Your action this week: write down which of the four jobs is your actual bottleneck. Measuring, or shipping? That answer picks your tool faster than any feature grid.
The B2B GEO tools at a glance
| # | Tool | Lowest paid plan | Engines tracked | Produces content? | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSmith | $99/mo (Pro) | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Google AI Mode (by tier) | Yes, full pipeline plus publish | Teams needing tracking and on-brand production in one place |
| 2 | AirOps | Free tier; Pro reported around $2,000/mo | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google | Yes, workflows and content engine | Mid-market and enterprise running programmatic content |
| 3 | Profound | $99/mo (Starter, annual) | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews; up to 10 on Enterprise | Partial | Enterprise brands with multi-region programs |
| 4 | AthenaHQ | Free tier; $295/mo (Starter) | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude | Partial, recommendations | Mid-market teams wanting a free starting point |
| 5 | Peec AI | From $99/mo (Starter) | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews/Mode; Gemini on Advanced | No | Teams that want clean visibility analytics |
| 6 | Scrunch | $250/mo (Core) | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Mode, and more | No | Brands preparing large sites for AI agents |
| 7 | Rankscale | $99/mo (Pro) | 17+ engines | No | Agencies and enterprises needing widest coverage |
| 8 | LLMrefs | $79/mo (All-in-One) | 10 engines | No | Solo marketers wanting breadth on a budget |
| 9 | Otterly AI | $29/mo (Lite) | ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot | No | Small teams getting started |
1. DeepSmith
Best for: B2B marketing leads who need to know where they're invisible and then actually close the gap, without adding headcount or a second tool.
Let's be upfront: DeepSmith is our product. You should weigh that. What follows is the honest case for why it leads this list, and further down we're just as honest about when someone else fits better.
Most tools in this category stop at the diagnosis. They hand you a dashboard showing the prompts where competitors get cited and you don't, and then the work lands back on your team. If your bottleneck is producing GEO for B2B content, a better dashboard doesn't help.
DeepSmith pairs AI search analytics with content production in one platform. It tracks how AI engines answer questions about your brand, finds the gaps, and produces publish-ready articles to close them, all from the same context.
What you get:
- AI Search Visibility. Mention rate, citation rate, and share of voice with trends, broken out per platform. A competitor leaderboard shows who wins your prompts and on which exact pages. The Pages view tells you which of your URLs AI actually cites, and which prompts drive them.
- Prompt tracking with real depth. Per-prompt mention and citation rates with full answer history. Discover Prompts generates a starter set from your product, persona, and buyer-stage context, so you're not staring at an empty prompt list on day one.
- Content Intelligence. Track what competitors publish as it ships. Remix turns a competitor page that's working into idea titles in your backlog. My Topics tracks keyword clusters with volume, difficulty, and how much you already cover.
- Content Studio. Ideas move from Idea Bank to Planned to Produced. The Writer turns a planned idea into a finished article, researched, internally and externally linked, with a cover image and metadata. Autowrite runs it on a schedule with nobody in the app.
- Deep IQ. Your brand context stored once: positioning, products, personas, brand voice, visual guidelines, content types. Every draft is grounded in it, so you're not re-briefing per article.
- Distribution built in. Finished articles arrive with social copy ready to paste, and the Apps Library adapts a piece for LinkedIn, X, Medium, Substack, newsletters, Reddit, and more.
Pricing. Pro is $99/mo ($80 annual) for 20 articles, 50 tracked prompts, 5 seats, ChatGPT only. Grow is $199/mo ($160 annual) for 40 articles, 100 prompts, 7 seats, adding Perplexity. Scale is $399/mo ($299 annual) for 90 articles, 200 prompts, 10 seats, adding Gemini. Enterprise is custom with all engines, 1:1 onboarding, and a dedicated account manager. There's a 7-day free trial, no long-term contracts, no cancellation fees.
Honest limitation. Engine coverage climbs by tier. Pro is ChatGPT only, and if you need Claude and Google AI Mode from day one, you're starting at Enterprise, not at $99. And while output is publish-ready rather than a first draft to rescue, you should still review for editorial judgment on claims and positioning. This is a production engine, not a replacement for your judgment.
2. AirOps
Best for: mid-market and enterprise teams building repeatable content workflows across many pages and CMSes.
AirOps started as a content workflow platform and grew into a full AI-search growth platform. If your team thinks in pipelines and templates, you'll feel at home fast.
What you get: no-code workflow building, agentic content creation, brand kit management, knowledge-base ingestion, CMS integrations, and a marketplace of templates. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google. Enterprise adds SSO/SAML, SOC 2, and 1:1 onboarding. Webflow is a named customer, reporting a lift in AI-attributed signups within days and a large speed gain on content refreshes.
Pricing. Insights starts free. Pro has been reported in third-party reviews at around $2,000/mo, and Enterprise is custom.
Honest limitation. That Pro price puts it out of reach for most small and mid-size B2B teams. Setup is heavier than a plug-in tracker, and pricing transparency varies by sales conversation. You're buying a platform to build on, not something that works the afternoon you sign up.
3. Profound
Best for: enterprise brands that need the deepest analytics and the compliance posture to defend the purchase.
Profound is the analytics heavyweight here. Its prompt-volume data is the most developed in the category, estimating real demand for prompts that never show up in a traditional keyword tool.
What you get: Answer Engine Insights, prompt volume estimates, sentiment and context analysis, historical data going back over a year, multi-brand tracking, and enterprise security. Starter covers ChatGPT; Growth adds Perplexity and Google AI Overviews; Enterprise reaches up to 10 engines including Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Meta AI.
Pricing. Starter is $99/mo billed yearly for 50 prompts on ChatGPT only. Growth is $399/mo billed yearly for three engines and 100 prompts. Enterprise is custom with SSO/SAML, SOC 2, and dedicated Slack support.
Honest limitation. Profound tells you what to write. It doesn't write it. You'll need a production tool alongside it, which means two subscriptions and two workflows. Meaningful multi-engine coverage doesn't start until $399/mo.
4. AthenaHQ
Best for: mid-market B2B teams who want tracking plus recommendations, and a free tier to prove the category matters before they spend.
AthenaHQ is one of the few tools that goes past the dashboard, layering agent-generated content recommendations on top of visibility tracking.
What you get: tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Claude on the free tier, expanding to nine engines on Starter, including AI Mode, Copilot, Grok, and Meta AI. Starter adds content recommendations and API access. Enterprise brings a knowledge base, claim review, and a dedicated AEO strategist.
Pricing. Essential is free with starting credits. Starter is $295/mo for 3,600 credits and all nine engines. Enterprise is custom.
Honest limitation. The jump from free to $295/mo Starter is steep next to budget trackers. Credit-based pricing gets hard to predict once your prompt volume grows, and recommendations still aren't finished articles.
5. Peec AI
Best for: marketing teams that want clean visibility analytics and already have a writing workflow to act on them.
Peec is dashboard-first and unapologetic about it. If your team can read data and knows what to do next, that focus is a feature.
What you get: visibility, position, and sentiment tracking, prompt organization by tag, brand and competitor benchmarking, source and citation analysis, and action recommendations. Pro and up cover ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Mode, and Microsoft Copilot. Gemini arrives on Advanced.
Pricing. Starter from $99/mo covers 3 prompts and 1 user. Pro from $199/mo brings 3 projects, 6 users, and brand alerts. Advanced from $399/mo adds unlimited projects, 10 users, and API access. Enterprise is custom.
Honest limitation. Three prompts on Starter is very tight for a real B2B prompt set, so most teams land on Pro or higher quickly. Daily refresh only lands on the top tier. There's no production, so B2B AI answer optimization still depends on your writers.
6. Scrunch
Best for: brands with big existing sites that want AI agents to read them properly.
Scrunch takes a different angle. Its Agent Experience Platform detects AI agents at the edge and serves them content optimized for machine reading, without changing what humans see.
What you get: Core covers 125 prompts, 5 site audits monthly, one brand workspace, 5 seats, and four engines. Enterprise stretches to nine engines including Claude, Gemini, Meta AI, Google AI Mode, and Grok, with unlimited prompts, full agent-experience delivery, SSO, and a dedicated account team. An agency plan exists separately.
Pricing. Core starts at $250/mo. Enterprise is custom.
Honest limitation. Scrunch assumes you already have a working content library. It optimizes how agents read what you've published, and it doesn't produce anything new. At $250/mo entry, it's a poor fit for small teams and for anyone whose real problem is thin content.
7. Rankscale
Best for: agencies running visibility for many clients, and enterprises that want the widest engine list available.
If breadth is your requirement, Rankscale covers more engines than anything else here, at 17 and counting.
What you get: Pro brings 1,200 credits, up to 4,800 AI responses, 10 brand dashboards, 50 page audits, unlimited search terms, all regions, plus GA4, Search Console, and Looker Studio connections. Growth adds white-label reporting and REST API. Enterprise adds a dedicated partner manager and Slack support.
Pricing. Pro is $99/mo, Growth is $385/mo, Enterprise is $780/mo.
Honest limitation. No content production. Credit-based pricing gets unpredictable when you expand prompt volume or audit heavy pages, and the tier jumps are steep once you outgrow Pro.
8. LLMrefs
Best for: solo marketers and small teams who want broad engine coverage at the lowest price that still includes guidance.
LLMrefs keeps it simple with one published plan and unusual breadth for the money.
What you get: 500 tracked prompts across 10 engines, covering ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, and DeepSeek. It also includes an AI crawlability checker, a Reddit threads finder, an LLMs.txt generator, content-gap insights from citation analysis, geo-targeting across many countries and languages, share of voice and position metrics, exports, and API access.
Pricing. All-in-One at $79/mo.
Honest limitation. Weekly refresh only, on the single plan available. No production module. It's a smaller brand than the category leaders, which matters if procurement wants a vendor with scale behind it.
9. Otterly AI
Best for: solo marketers and small teams who want to start tracking this afternoon.
Otterly is the cheapest paid entry point in the category, and there's no shame in starting here. Starting beats waiting.
What you get: monitoring across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot. Standard steps up to 100 prompts with daily monitoring and API access. Premium reaches 400 prompts, wider engine coverage, and dedicated onboarding.
Pricing. Lite is $29/mo for 15 prompts with weekly monitoring. Standard is $189/mo. Premium is $489/mo.
Honest limitation. Claude and Gemini are paid add-ons rather than included tier steps, which feels awkward next to competitors that bundle them. Weekly monitoring on Lite is slow if your category moves fast. No content production.
Three more worth knowing
Goodie AI ($399/mo Explorer) has the broadest LLM coverage at the top tier and a strong revenue attribution story, but its standout features center on agentic commerce and SKU-level tracking. If you're pure B2B SaaS with nothing to put in a cart, you're paying for reach you won't use.
Knowatoa ($59/mo Starter) runs weekly prompts and hands you recommendations rather than dashboards, which suits a founder who doesn't want to learn another analytics tool. The tradeoff is depth: if you want raw data, it's lighter than Profound or Peec.
Addlly AI (custom quote) couples a blog writer with social and SEO agents plus an AI search tracker, aimed mainly at APAC-headquartered teams. Pricing requires a sales conversation and engine coverage is narrower than the leaders.
How to choose
Skip the feature grid for a second. The best GEO tools for B2B sort themselves neatly once you answer one question: is your problem knowing, or doing?
If you can't see anything yet, start cheap and start now. Otterly at $29/mo or LLMrefs at $79/mo will show you where you stand in weeks. You can graduate later.
If you have writers and just need the data, Peec or Profound are strong picks. Peec is friendlier for a marketer who wants to self-serve. Profound goes deeper, and if you're an enterprise with procurement, security review, and multi-region needs, Profound is the better call than us. We'd rather tell you that than sell you the wrong fit.
If you're an agency, look hard at Rankscale for white-label reporting and API access across many client brands.
If your site is large and your problem is machine readability, Scrunch is solving a problem nobody else on this list is solving.
If you want to build workflows and have real budget, AirOps is built for that, and its template and CMS depth is genuine.
If your bottleneck is producing the content, that's where DeepSmith fits. Comparison pages, thought-leadership explainers, alternatives pages, the assets that win buyer-research prompts, produced on-brand and published without a second tool. Grow at $199/mo covers the typical B2B case. Move to Scale at $399/mo when you need Gemini and heavier volume.
One honest note: no tool on this list, ours included, can guarantee you a citation. They track, diagnose, prioritize, and in a few cases produce. The engines decide the rest.
Start with what you can see
You don't need a bigger team. You need a smaller first step.
Pick your ten most important buyer questions. Run them through ChatGPT and Perplexity this week. Write down who gets cited. That exercise costs you an hour, and it usually settles the tooling debate on its own.
Then, if what you find is that competitors own the answers and your team can't ship fast enough to catch up, start a free DeepSmith trial and see real data and real drafts before you pay. Seven days, no contract.
You're closer than you think. Most teams haven't started at all.



