Peec AI is a self-serve tracker that reports how AI engines mention and cite your brand, with published plans from $95 a month and no content tools. Conductor is a sales-led enterprise SEO and AEO suite that adds drafting and 24/7 site monitoring, with no public prices and no publishing to a CMS. DeepSmith tracks AI answers and also writes publish-ready articles that go straight to your CMS, on public plans from $99 a month with no long-term contract.
Peec AI vs Conductor looks like a choice between two AI visibility products, but the two are built for different buyers and different ways of buying. One is a lightweight tracker you can start on your own, and the other is an enterprise suite you buy through a sales team. This page covers what each does, what each costs, and what happens after a visibility gap shows up, with DeepSmith placed as a third option for teams that want to close the gap in the same platform.
Peec AI vs Conductor: the short answer
- Choose DeepSmith if you want AI visibility tracking and article production on one self-serve plan, with finished articles that publish to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity or Contentful, and prices that start at $99 a month.
- Choose Peec AI if you only need daily prompt tracking at a published price ($95 a month for 50 prompts and unlimited users) and you will handle the content work yourself.
- Choose Conductor if you are a large team that wants AI visibility next to keyword rankings, 24/7 technical monitoring and SOC 2 Type II security, and you can buy through a sales process.
| Criterion | DeepSmith | Peec AI | Conductor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price (monthly) | $99/mo (Pro) | $95/mo (Starter) | Not published |
| Annual price | $80/mo billed yearly | $80/mo billed yearly (as of Sept 4, 2026) | Not published |
| Prompts at entry tier | 50 | 50 | Not published (2,500 AI Search credits a year) |
| Engines at entry tier | ChatGPT | 3 of 6 options | Not published |
| Most engines on any plan | 10 (Enterprise) | Up to 13 (Enterprise) | 8 tracked, plan split not published |
| Free trial | 7 days | Yes, length not stated | Yes, 3 weeks, no card |
| Citation tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Content generation | Yes | No | Yes |
| Brand-context grounding | Yes | Partial | Yes |
| CMS publishing | Yes | Not listed | No |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 report | Yes | No | Yes |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 | 4.8/5 | 4.5/5 |
Pricing and features as of September 2026, from each vendor's site and public reviews.
Peec AI
Peec AI is a Berlin company founded in January 2025 that tracks how often a brand is mentioned, where it ranks and which sources get cited in answers from ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot and others. It is built for SEO, content and marketing teams, and for agencies with several client brands, that want daily tracking at a published price.
The standout is how much comes with the entry plan. Brand plans run $95, $245 and $495 a month for 50, 150 and 350 prompts, with unlimited users, languages and competitors on every plan. The pricing grid shows prompt suggestions, source analytics, query fan-outs, AI shopping, an ads library and an MCP server on Starter as well as the higher tiers. Peec says it collects answers mostly by scraping the consumer interfaces of AI engines, and it stores the raw answers so you can read them. Peec also publishes its own comparisons with Profound and Semrush, and our Profound vs Peec page covers the first of those.
The real limitation is that Peec does not write anything. Its own Actions FAQ says users create the content themselves, and its recommendations stop at telling you what to change. Self-serve brand plans also choose three active models from six, and Perplexity costs extra. Peec has no verified SOC 2 report, and its January 2026 comparison page said SOC 2 was being pursued but not yet offered.
Reviewers like the interface and the quick setup. G2 shows 4.8/5 from 20 reviews as of September 29, 2026, which is a small sample, so it says more about first impressions than about long-term support. Some reviewers found the recommendations generic. Our Peec review goes deeper on its features and pricing.
Conductor
Conductor is a New York company founded in 2006 that sells an enterprise SEO and AEO platform made of four products. Intelligence covers AI search and keyword reporting, Creator handles drafting and content scoring, Monitoring crawls sites around the clock, and AgentStack provides the MCP server, APIs and agents. It is aimed at larger, often multi-site teams that want AI visibility in the same system as their other search data.
Its standout is breadth. Conductor tracks eight engines, with ChatGPT covered in both Auto and Search modes, and it ties AI citations to pages, analytics sessions and conversions. Its security page lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001, and SAML SSO is included from the Growth plan.
The limits are mostly about buying. Conductor publishes allowances for Essentials, Growth and Enterprise but no dollar prices, and AI tracking runs on credits that cost between 0.1 and 2 per response depending on the engine, so the number of answers you can track depends on your engine mix. According to its published US terms, fees are set in an order form, are noncancellable and nonrefundable by default, and renew automatically unless you give 90 days' notice. It also does not publish to a CMS. Its Writing Assistant says final publishing stays in your CMS.
On review sites, G2 shows 4.5/5 from 788 reviews as of September 30, 2026. Reviewers praise support and the link between SEO and AI reporting. They also mention a learning curve and a price that is hard to justify for smaller teams.
DeepSmith: the alternative that tracks, writes and publishes
Peec AI and Conductor leave different gaps for the same reader. Peec shows you where you are missing and then hands the work back to you. Conductor writes drafts but stops before the CMS, and it asks you to go through a sales process and a contract to get there. For a marketing lead who wants to see a gap and have a finished page live a short time later, both setups leave several manual steps in the middle. The DeepSmith vs Peec comparison covers the tracker side of that in more detail.
DeepSmith closes that gap in one platform. Its AI Visibility module tracks mention rate, citation rate, share of voice and sentiment across the engines in your plan, shows which of your pages AI actually cites, and reports who wins the citations you are missing. Opportunity Agents then turn those findings into content ideas, and each idea carries the data point that justifies it, so you can defend the backlog instead of guessing at it.
From there the Writer turns a planned idea into a finished article, grounded in the brand context you set up once in Deep IQ, with internal and external links, a cover image and publish-ready metadata. Autowrite can write on a schedule with no one in the app, and the article lands in Produced Content. You review it there and publish straight to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity or Contentful, or to your own webhooks.
The terms are also simpler to evaluate. Pro is $99 a month, Grow is $199 and Scale is $399, or $80, $160 and $299 a month billed annually, with 20, 40 and 90 articles a month and 50, 100 and 200 tracked prompts. There is a 7-day free trial and no long-term contract or cancellation fee. DeepSmith is rated 4.8/5 on G2 and is SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certified.
Engine coverage and tracking depth
In a Conductor vs Peec AI comparison of tracking, Conductor has the deeper setup and Peec has the simpler one. Conductor documents eight engines, lets you set persona, intent, location, language and a daily, weekly or monthly schedule for each topic, and shows fan-out queries next to the full response. Peec runs each prompt once a day on every active model, and it adds position tracking, AI shopping and an ads library that Conductor does not describe.
The catch on both sides is how engines map to plans. On Peec's self-serve brand plans you pick three active models, and adding Perplexity costs $30, $70 or $140 a month billed annually, depending on the plan. Conductor does not publish which engines come with which plan, and its credit costs make some engines far cheaper to track than others. Google AI Overviews and AI Mode cost 0.1 credits per response, while ChatGPT Search and Gemini cost 2. Peec says it scrapes consumer interfaces, while Conductor says it uses official engine APIs wherever possible. Neither claim has been independently checked, so treat the difference as a design choice and not as a measure of accuracy.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith covers ten engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Grok, Meta AI, Microsoft Copilot and DeepSeek. Pro tracks ChatGPT, Grow adds Perplexity, Scale adds Gemini, and Enterprise covers all ten. Every prompt keeps its own mention rate, citation rate and full answer history.
Pricing and contract terms
When you weigh Peec AI or Conductor on price, Peec wins on transparency, because its prices are on the page and Conductor's are not. A Peec buyer can read the plan table and know that 50 prompts cost $95 a month, that unlimited users are included, and that annual billing lowers the rate by about 15 percent. Peec's terms also allow monthly termination at the end of a billing cycle.
Conductor sells through a quote. The pricing page lists drafts, pages analyzed, tracked keywords, competitors and monitored pages for each plan, and gives 2,500 AI Search credits a year on Essentials and Growth, but it shows no dollar amount for any plan. Some items in the plan grid are marked "Available" instead of "Included", including the Data API and log file analysis on the two lower plans, and the page does not say whether that means an extra charge. The Enterprise drafts figure is also inconsistent on the page, at 600 a year on the plan card and "Custom" in the grid. Add the order-form terms described above and the real cost of Conductor only becomes clear after a sales conversation.
That does not make Conductor poor value for the right buyer. A team that would otherwise pay for separate keyword, content and monitoring tools may find the bundle cheaper than the parts. It does mean that a fair price comparison needs a quote.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith publishes four plans, with prices, article allowances, prompt limits and seats on the pricing page. You can pay monthly or annually, start with a 7-day free trial, and cancel without a fee.
Security and procurement
Conductor leads here. Its security page lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001, with documents available on request, and its plans include SAML SSO from Growth and role-based permissions on Enterprise. For a security team working through a vendor questionnaire, that is a short path, and our guide to evaluating enterprise AI SEO software lists what else to ask.
Peec has no verified SOC 2 report. It offers SAML 2.0 SSO on Enterprise with domain verification, but not OIDC or SCIM, and its privacy policy describes GDPR practices that are stated by Peec and not independently audited. A buyer with a hard SOC 2 requirement would need to ask Peec for its current status before shortlisting it.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith is SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certified, which gives a security review something concrete to check on a self-serve plan. Workspaces are isolated per brand or client, and teammates join as owners or members.
Data access and integrations
On data access the two are close, with Conductor ahead on breadth. Both include an MCP server on every plan, so you can query visibility data from an AI assistant. Conductor adds Google Analytics, Google Search Console, a Data API for BI tools and warehouses, and official apps in ChatGPT, Claude and Microsoft Copilot. Peec adds CSV exports on every brand plan, a Looker Studio connector from the Advanced plan, and a customer API that its docs describe as beta and limited to Enterprise, even though its pricing grid lists it from Pro.
If you plan to build reports or agents on top of the data, check the plan gating on both before you buy. In each case the most useful pieces sit on the higher tiers.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith has a read-only REST API with scoped keys, an MCP server with 23 read-only tools, and signed webhooks that fire on content status changes. Teams can pull visibility data into their own tools and trigger downstream workflows when an article is ready.
From insight to action
Conductor leads on this axis simply because it writes, and Peec does not. Conductor's Recommendations panel ranks actions and links into the Writing Assistant, which produces outlines and full drafts, scores them for topical coverage and intent alignment, applies saved voice and tone profiles, and suggests internal links. Drafts are capped by plan, at 60 a year on Essentials and 180 on Growth. Conductor says every draft should be reviewed by people before publishing, and it states that publishing stays in your CMS. Its Drupal integration brings guidance and scoring into the editor, but it does not publish from Conductor. Teams that need this step can compare AI content tools with CMS auto-publish.
Peec's Actions feature groups cited sources, computes gaps against competitors and gives prioritized on-page and off-page steps with an opportunity score. After that, the content work belongs to you or to an outside tool, and Peec's own materials describe briefs and rewrites only through an external assistant connected over MCP. The step from report to fix is covered in turning tracking data into fixes.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith takes an article from gap to live page without leaving the platform. Opportunity Agents find the gap and attach the evidence, the Writer produces a publish-ready article in your brand voice, Autowrite schedules the writing, and Produced Content publishes it to your CMS. Every finished article also arrives with social posts already written, so distribution does not become a separate chore.
Which should you choose
- DeepSmith fits marketing teams that want to track AI visibility and publish the content that fixes it in one place, on public prices, with no contract to negotiate. It suits lean teams and agencies that need to move from a gap to a live article without handing work between tools.
- Peec AI fits a team that already has writers or other AI tools and wants a focused, affordable tracker with daily prompt data. In the Peec AI or Conductor decision, it is the better pick when you want a published price, a quick start and no sales process. If it does not fit, these Peec alternatives cover other trackers.
- Conductor fits a large organization with several sites that wants AI visibility, keyword rankings and technical monitoring in one enterprise suite, and has the budget and procurement process for a quoted contract. In a Conductor vs Peec AI comparison, it wins for breadth and security.
The Peec AI vs Conductor pros and cons come down to scope and buying style. Peec gives you clear tracking and a clear price but no content work, and Conductor gives you a wide suite and strong security but a quote, a contract and a CMS step you handle yourself.
Start a free DeepSmith trial at app.deepsmith.ai to track your AI visibility and publish the articles that close the gaps from one platform.
