Peec AI runs each tracked prompt once a day per model and shows the raw answers and URL-level sources, from $95 a month. Evertune asks each prompt 100 times per model and keeps base-model knowledge apart from consumer-app answers, with Pro listed at $800 a month behind a demo. DeepSmith is a strong alternative that tracks, writes and publishes to your CMS from a self-serve $99 plan.
If you are weighing Peec AI vs Evertune, the first thing to settle is what kind of number you want to put in front of leadership. The two tools collect AI answers in different ways, so a visibility percentage from one does not mean quite the same thing as a percentage from the other. This page covers how each tool gathers its data, what the figures can support, and what each one costs. DeepSmith comes in as a third option for teams that also need to act on the numbers.
Peec AI vs Evertune: the short answer
- Choose DeepSmith if you want AI visibility tracking, evidence-backed ideas, finished articles and CMS publishing on one self-serve plan, from $99 a month with a 7-day free trial.
- Choose Peec AI if you want daily prompt tracking with raw answers and URL-level sources at a published price, starting at $95 a month, and you plan to write the content yourself.
- Choose Evertune if you want each prompt sampled 100 times per model, with base-model answers kept separate from consumer-app answers, and you are fine with a sales demo and an $800 a month Pro plan.
| DeepSmith | Peec AI | Evertune | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price (monthly) | $99/mo (Pro) | $95/mo (Starter) | $800/mo (Pro) |
| Annual price | $80/mo billed yearly | $80/mo (seen Sept 4, 2026) | Not listed |
| Prompts at entry tier | 50 | 50 | 100,000 |
| Engines at entry tier | ChatGPT | 3 chosen from 6 | 11 AI models |
| Sampling per prompt | - | Once every 24 hours per model | 100 times per model |
| Free trial | Yes, 7 days | Yes, length not stated | No, demo only |
| Citation tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitor benchmarking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Full answer history | Yes | Yes | Not listed |
| Content generation | Yes | No | Yes |
| CMS publishing | Yes | Not listed | No |
| Public API | Yes | Yes, beta | Not listed |
| SOC 2 report | Yes | No | No |
| Review rating | 4.8/5 on G2 | 4.8/5 on G2 | Unrated on G2 |
Pricing and features as of September 2026, from each vendor's site and public reviews.
Peec AI
Peec AI is a Berlin company founded in January 2025 that sells AI search analytics to marketing teams and agencies. It runs your tracked prompts through AI engines every day, mostly by scraping the consumer interfaces, and reports visibility, position, sentiment, share of voice and the sources each answer cites. Brand plans start at $95 a month for 50 prompts and three active models, with unlimited users. Pro is $245 for 150 prompts and Advanced is $495 for 350. Enterprise is custom.
The standout is how open the method is. Peec stores the raw answers in a Chats table and reports sources at domain and URL level, so you can read what the engine actually said. The practical limits are that the self-serve plans choose three active models, Perplexity is a paid add-on, and Peec does not write content. Its Actions feature recommends what to change and leaves the creating to you. There is no SOC 2 report as of the last check, although Peec has said it is pursuing one.
Peec has grown quickly, and TechCrunch reported in May 2026 that an internal dashboard showed more than $10 million in annualized revenue. Reviewers on G2 rate Peec 4.8/5 from 20 reviews (checked September 29, 2026), mostly praising the interface, quick setup and support. That is a small sample, so read it as an early signal.
Evertune
Evertune is a New York company founded in 2024 by early members of The Trade Desk team, and it calls itself a marketing platform for brand discovery in AI search. It measures how often AI models mention and rank a brand against competitors, then connects the gaps to content, site fixes, affiliate placements and ChatGPT and programmatic ads. Its tracked prompts come from EverPanel, a consumer prompt panel that Evertune says holds more than 150 million prompts.
The standout is the sampling. Evertune says every prompt is asked 100 times per model, and it keeps base-model answers collected through provider APIs apart from answers from consumer apps. Pro is listed at $800 a month for 100,000 tracked prompts across 11 AI models, plus 25 articles a month. Everything goes through a demo request, with no trial or free plan.
The limits are mostly about what is unpublished. No customer API, MCP server or CMS connector is described, and content leaves as Markdown or HTML. There is no SOC 2 report yet, though Evertune said Type II was in progress in January 2026. G2 shows no reviews, so the proof you can check today is Evertune's own case studies.
DeepSmith: the alternative that tracks, writes and publishes
Peec AI and Evertune both stop short of one step for a team that has to ship pages. Peec AI tells you what to change and leaves the writing to you. Evertune writes drafts, 25 a month on Pro, and the finished piece leaves as Markdown or HTML for you to copy into your CMS. Neither record shows an article going from an AI visibility gap to a live page in the same product. Our roundup of tools that track and write for AI search compares the options in this group.
DeepSmith is built around that loop. It tracks how AI engines answer the questions you define, keeps the full answer history for each prompt, and reports mention rate, citation rate and share of voice with trends. Opportunity Agents read that data and return content ideas, and every idea carries the specific data point that justifies it, so you can defend the backlog instead of guessing at it.
The Writer then turns a planned idea into a researched, internally and externally linked article with a cover image and publish-ready metadata, grounded in your Deep IQ brand context. Autowrite can do this on a set date with nobody in the app. Produced Content publishes straight to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity or Contentful, or to your own webhooks.
The terms are different too. Plans are self-serve at $99, $199 and $399 a month ($80, $160 and $299 billed annually), with 20, 40 and 90 articles a month, a 7-day free trial and no long-term contracts. DeepSmith is SOC 2, GDPR and ISO certified and rated 4.8/5 on G2. We compare DeepSmith vs Peec in more detail on its own page.
Tracking depth and data method
Evertune wins on sampling depth, and Peec AI wins on showing the raw evidence behind each number.
The Peec AI vs Evertune measurement method question comes down to one fact about AI engines: they do not give the same answer every time. One answer is a single draw from a range of possible answers. This run-to-run movement is why AI citations keep changing, and it is the reason a single check can mislead. Our guide to AI visibility measurement covers how to audit and track results before you pick a tool. The AI visibility metrics guide explains which figures to report.
Peec AI deals with it by repeating the check over time. Each prompt runs once every 24 hours on every selected model, so a prompt on one model produces about 30 answers in a month. Peec says it collects them by scraping the consumer interfaces with infrastructure in each supported country, which it says is closer to what a logged-out user sees. That is a sensible choice, though it does not guarantee that every user sees the sampled answer.
Evertune deals with it by repeating the check in one go. It asks every prompt 100 times per model, and states a margin of error of about 1 point overall and 2 points at topic level. Third-party research repeated the method as Evertune describes it and did not find it contradicted, but the margin is Evertune's own figure, so I would ask to see how it is calculated. The pricing page also does not say whether each of the 100,000 prompts on Pro counts every one of the 100 samples, which is worth asking in the demo.
Evertune adds a second layer. It collects base-model answers through provider APIs, which show what a model knows without searching, and consumer-app answers, which show what a user sees. API answers and chat interface answers can differ, so keeping them apart tells you whether a gap is about what the model knows or about what the app retrieves.
In an Evertune vs Peec AI choice, this is the practical split. If leadership wants one percentage with a stated margin, Evertune gives you something to defend. If they want to click through to the answer itself, Peec AI does.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith checks the questions you define on a schedule you set and keeps the full answer history for each prompt. Mention rate, citation rate and share of voice come with period-over-period trends, and because the history is kept, a change in a rate can be read against the answers that produced it.
Engine coverage
Evertune wins on engines at its entry price, with the caveat that its list needs a close read.
Evertune lists 11 AI models on Pro and does not publish which plan includes which. The detail sits in its help center. ChatGPT and Gemini are sampled both as base models and as consumer apps, and Google AI Overviews and AI Mode are tracked. Perplexity and Copilot are consumer-app only. Claude, Meta AI and DeepSeek are base-model only, because their consumer apps sit behind a login. Grok does not appear anywhere. So 11 experiences does not mean 11 consumer chat apps.
Peec AI is more plain about plans. Starter, Pro and Advanced each choose three active models from ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini and Naver AI. Perplexity is a paid add-on at $30, $70 or $140 a month billed annually, and Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and the other API-labeled models appear only on Enterprise and the higher agency plans. If Perplexity or Claude matters to your buyers, check which plan carries it before you compare prices. Our roundup of AI visibility tools lists more options if neither fits on engines.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith covers ten engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Grok, Meta AI, Microsoft Copilot and DeepSeek. Pro tracks ChatGPT, Grow adds Perplexity, Scale adds Gemini, and Enterprise covers all ten.
Competitor and citation analysis
This one is close to a tie on the core features, with different extras.
Both tools separate mentions from sources, and the difference between citations and brand mentions matters when you explain the numbers to leadership. Peec AI reports cited sources at domain and URL level with citation share and source classification, and it distinguishes pages the engine used from pages it cited. Side-by-side visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice are available against unlimited competitors on every plan.
Evertune goes further on scoring. Its Content Analytics lists every domain and URL AI cites, scores each on Topic Relevance, Brand Relevance and Brand Sentiment, and sorts them into Owned, Strength and Opportunity URLs. It ranks competitors automatically on the same prompts. Its own Profound comparison page claims no competitor slot limit, which is a vendor claim.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith shows who wins citations for your prompts, on which exact pages, and how each competitor performs by platform. Its Pages view shows which of your pages AI actually cites and the prompts driving those citations.
Pricing and value
Peec AI wins on entry price and openness, and Evertune lists a far larger prompt allowance.
Peec AI publishes $95, $245 and $495 a month for Starter, Pro and Advanced, with 50, 150 and 350 prompts. Its FAQ gives a 15% discount for annual billing, and a third-party read of its page on September 4, 2026 showed $80 a month for Starter on annual billing. There is a self-serve free trial, though the length is not stated.
Evertune lists Pro at $800 a month with 100,000 tracked prompts, 25 articles a month and three onboarding sessions. Annual pricing, seats and billing term are not published, and its platform terms allow per-prompt fees and overages set on the order page. The prompt counts are not directly comparable, because Evertune samples each prompt 100 times per model and Peec runs it once a day. If you need to try a tool before talking to sales, our list of AI visibility tools with a free trial shows which ones allow it.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith publishes every price. Pro is $99 a month for 50 tracked prompts, 20 articles and 5 seats, Grow is $199 for 100 prompts, 40 articles and 7 seats, and Scale is $399 for 200 prompts, 90 articles and 10 seats. One plan covers the tracking and the writing.
From insight to action
Evertune wins here, because it writes drafts and runs activation tools while Peec AI stops at recommendations.
Peec AI's Actions feature gives prioritized on-page and off-page steps with a Relative Opportunity Score, included on every plan. It does not write articles, and briefs or rewrites happen only if you ask an outside assistant through its MCP server.
Evertune connects the data to more. Its Insights Agent sets weekly priorities, Content Studio builds briefs from visibility gaps with three strategies per topic, and the Content Agent writes full drafts in one of six templates using your stored brand guidelines. Site Audit crawls up to 1,000 pages, and Partner Connect maps opportunities to affiliate and programmatic networks. The ChatGPT Ads Manager is still in beta. Drafts export as Markdown or HTML, with no CMS connector named.
What DeepSmith does: DeepSmith turns visibility gaps into a content backlog with the evidence attached to each idea. The Writer produces the article, Autowrite schedules it, and Produced Content publishes it to your CMS in one action. Repurpose and the Apps Library then adapt the finished article for LinkedIn, X, newsletters and other channels.
Which should you choose
When the decision is Peec AI or Evertune, the answer depends on the number you need and what you do after you have it.
- DeepSmith: the broad fit for content and marketing teams, and agencies, that want to see where they appear in AI answers and then close the gaps with finished, on-brand articles published to their CMS, on a self-serve plan with a free trial.
- Peec AI: an SEO or content team, or an agency with several clients, that wants daily tracking with readable raw answers and URL-level sources at a published price, and will write the content itself.
- Evertune: a mid-market or enterprise team that wants repeated sampling with base-model and app answers separated, may also buy affiliate or programmatic media, and is comfortable buying through a demo.
Try DeepSmith free for 7 days and see tracking, evidence-backed ideas and finished articles on your own prompts. Start your free trial.
