DeepSmith

Jul 26 · Tools & Comparisons

17 min read

Best AI SEO Tools for Agencies

Avinash Saurabh
Avinash Saurabh · CO-Founder & CEO
Monochrome geometric cover showing four layered client workspace cards, each holding chart fragments and answer blocks, wired by thin lines to central search icons, around the centred cover line 'AI SEO Across Every Client'.

A client emails you: "My competitor keeps showing up in ChatGPT. Why don't we?"

If your stomach drops a little at that question, you're not behind. You're just early, along with most of the industry. The tooling for this is still settling, and nobody has a decade of playbooks to lean on.

Here's the good news. You don't need a new department. You need a stack that handles two jobs at once: the classic SEO work you already sell, and the AI-answer work your clients are starting to ask about. The best AI SEO tools for agencies do both in one place, across every client on your roster, without you rebuilding context each time.

This roundup covers four: DeepSmith, Surfer, Scalenut, and Semrush. Each one is real and capable. Each one is right for a different kind of shop. Let's find yours.

How we picked these four

Criteria first, because a list without criteria is just opinion.

A tool made this roundup only if it cleared all four bars:

  1. Multi-client architecture. One login, several isolated client accounts. Separate brand context, content queue, billing, and seats. One client's voice must never leak into another's drafts.
  2. Both layers of the job. Classic SEO (keywords, optimization, audits) and AI-search visibility, or a credible workflow that connects them. A tool that only does one half leaves you buying the other half twice.
  3. Pricing an agency can actually start on. A real entry tier for one strategist, with a path up as the roster grows. No enterprise-only black boxes.
  4. Published, checkable facts. Public pricing, integrations, and product pages we can point at.

That last bar is why you won't see certain popular names here. Pure AI trackers with no production layer didn't qualify. Neither did single-brand tools that assume you serve one company. The AEO SEO tools agencies actually need have to survive contact with a portfolio, not a pet project.

One thing we deliberately didn't weigh: how clever the AI writing sounds in a demo. Every tool on this list can generate text. What separates agency AI SEO software from a writing toy is everything around the text, which is to say the context it draws on, the reporting it produces, and whether it can hold twelve clients without confusing two of them.

The four at a glance

ToolBest forAI engines trackedMulti-clientProductionEntry price (annual)
DeepSmithVisibility plus publish-ready content in one workspace per clientChatGPT (Pro); +Perplexity (Grow); +Gemini (Scale); all five on EnterpriseMulti-workspace, each fully isolated with its own context, content, and planThe Writer and Autowrite produce finished articles; publish to WordPress, Strapi, Webflow, or webhook$80/mo
SurferOn-page optimization with AI tracking layered onGoogle AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, PerplexityWorkspaces on higher tiers; unlimited on EnterpriseContent Editor, Auto-Optimize, Auto Internal Linking$49/mo
ScalenutSoftware plus human GEO strategists on retainerChatGPT and Google AIO; +Perplexity on Professional1, 2, then unlimited workspaces by tierCruise Mode guided writer, optimizer, clusters$24/mo (promo)
SemrushAgencies already standardized on SemrushGoogle Search AI features, ChatGPT, Perplexity, GeminiProject quotas rather than per-client workspacesContent Marketing Platform, sold separately$117.33/mo

Two notes before you scan that table and pick the cheapest row. Surfer's AI Tracker is a paid module that isn't on the entry tier. Scalenut's headline price is a promotion that reverts at renewal. Read the entries.

1. DeepSmith

Best for: agencies that want to sell AI-search visibility as a retainer and produce the content that closes the gaps, all from one client workspace, without rebuilding brand context every time.

DeepSmith is one platform for AI search analytics and content production. You see where a client shows up in AI answers, find the questions where they're invisible, and produce the on-brand articles that go after those gaps. Same data, same workspace, same client.

That pairing is the whole argument for putting it first. It's the only tool in this comparison that holds visibility data and content production against the same stored brand context. Everywhere else, those live in two products, and you're the integration.

How it fits an agency

Each client brand gets its own workspace under one login. Isolated context, isolated content queue, isolated AEO data, isolated billing. Invite teammates as owners or members.

Onboarding pulls the client's website in and populates Deep IQ before you pay anything: positioning, differentiators, products, personas, brand voice, visual guidelines, content types, trusted sources. Competitors and starter tracking prompts get seeded at the same time. That's the part that usually eats your first month on a new logo.

What you actually get

AEO (AI Search Visibility). You define the questions your client's buyers ask AI engines. The platform runs them on a schedule and reports back with Mention Rate (how often AI names the brand), Citation Rate (how often AI links to their pages), Share of Voice against a named competitor set, and Visibility Trend. The Prompts view gives per-question rates with full answer history. The Pages view shows which URLs AI actually cites and which prompts drive them. Competitor Citations shows who's beating your client, on which exact pages, per platform.

That last one is the slide that renews retainers.

Content Intelligence. A live feed of what each tracked competitor publishes, with full page history. Remix turns a competitor page that's working into idea titles in your Idea Bank. My Topics tracks keyword clusters with volume, difficulty, and how much you already cover. Discover Topics surfaces clusters you're not tracking yet, sourced from the client's site, a competitor's, or Search Console.

Content Studio. Ideas move from New Ideas to Planned to Produced. The Writer turns one planned idea into a finished, brand-grounded article: researched, internally and externally linked, cover image, publish-ready metadata. Autowrite goes further. Configure an article at planning time and it writes itself on its scheduled date and lands in Produced Content with nobody in the app. Review and publish to WordPress, Strapi, Webflow, or a webhook, with Markdown and HTML export as a fallback.

Repurpose and Apps. Every finished article arrives with social posts already written. The Apps Library turns it into native versions for LinkedIn, X, Medium, Substack, newsletter and nurture email, Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, Slack/Discord, WhatsApp, and more, each adapted to that channel. Your client gets a channel plan, not a blog post.

Deep IQ. The brand layer every other module reads from. It's why draft five for a client sounds like draft one, and why you're not re-briefing per article.

Sitemap. The client's published pages, summarized and classified automatically. Powers internal linking, coverage signals, and ideation dedup.

Pricing

PlanMonthlyAnnualArticles/moPromptsSeatsEngines
Pro$99$8020505ChatGPT
Grow$199$160401007ChatGPT, Perplexity
Scale$399$2999020010ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini
EnterpriseCustomCustomCustomCustomCustomAll five

Seven-day free trial with a working workspace populated before payment. No long-term contracts, no cancellation fees. Each workspace bills independently, which is what you want when a client churns.

On record from Aparna K, GTM Lead at Skooc: "Went from four articles a month to fifteen with the same two people." That's the shape of the win here. Same team, more output.

The honest limitation

Engine coverage rises with tier, and Pro is ChatGPT only. If a client needs Perplexity or Gemini tracked, you're on Grow or Scale, and the full five-engine set is Enterprise. Budget for the tier your reporting promise actually requires.

Two more things worth saying plainly. DeepSmith tracks mention and citation. It does not control or guarantee rankings, citations, traffic, or revenue, and no tool that tells you otherwise is being straight with you. And the output is publish-ready, not zero-touch. Autowrite can publish hands-off, but your editorial judgment is still the last mile.

2. Surfer

Best for: agencies whose core job is on-page SEO, whose writers already live in the Surfer editor, and who want AI visibility as an added layer rather than the spine of the workflow.

Surfer is an on-page optimization platform with AI-search tracking attached to a very good editor. If your delivery model is "make this client's pages rank," Surfer is built for exactly that motion.

Key features:

  • Content Editor with a real-time Content Score across 500+ on-page ranking factors: keyword coverage, entities, headings, structure, NLP terms, topical coverage.
  • Auto-Optimize pushes a draft toward top-ranking patterns in one click.
  • Auto Internal Linking surfaces contextual link opportunities.
  • Topic Research and Keyword Research for ideation, plus Site Audit for technical health.
  • AI Tracker monitors brand presence across Google AI Mode, Google AI Overview, Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity.
  • Integrations with Google Docs, WordPress, Contentful, Jasper, and a Chrome extension.

Pricing runs $49/mo Essential (10 articles, one user), $99/mo Scale (25 articles, unlimited team members, AI Tracker, AI Humanizer), $182/mo Scale AI (50 articles, advanced generation), and Enterprise from $999/mo with unlimited articles, API access, and white-label.

The honest limitation: AI Tracker isn't on Essential, so the $49 tier doesn't get you AI-search monitoring at all. You need Scale or above. And true white-label with unlimited workspaces is gated to Enterprise at $999/mo, which is a real number for a small shop. Surfer's architecture is on-page-first with AI visibility layered on, not the other way around.

3. Scalenut

Best for: agencies that want a hybrid: software for repeatable production, plus human GEO strategists steering the AI-visibility work.

Scalenut is an AI-SEO platform with a service layer bolted on, and that service layer is the interesting part. If you'd rather rent expertise than build it in-house this quarter, this is the entry to look at.

Key features:

  • Cruise Mode, a guided workflow from keyword to optimized draft in one run.
  • Content Optimizer with real-time NLP scoring.
  • Keyword Planner and Topic Clusters for topical authority.
  • Content Audit for refreshing existing pages, plus internal linking automation and On-page Pro recommendations.
  • AI Visibility Tracker covering ChatGPT and Google AIO, adding Perplexity on Professional and above.

Pricing (currently running a 60% promo) is $24/mo Starter (1 workspace, 1 domain, 10 GEO articles), $36/mo Plus (2 workspaces, 60 articles), and $80/mo Professional (unlimited workspaces and domains, 150 articles, 2,000 audit pages/mo, internal linking, Perplexity tracking). VIP Service is custom: dedicated strategists, writers and editors, monthly technical audits, backlinks, weekly calls, defined SLAs.

The honest limitation: that pricing is promotional and reverts at renewal, so model your margin on list, not on the promo. Engine coverage is also narrower than the rest of this list. ChatGPT and Google AIO on the lower tiers, Perplexity only at Professional and up, and Claude isn't listed at all. If you want pure self-serve software, you're partly paying for a human layer you may never use.

4. Semrush

Best for: agencies already standardized on Semrush for rank tracking, technical audits, and backlinks, who want to add AI visibility without leaving the ecosystem.

Nobody gets fired for keeping Semrush. It's the incumbent suite, the data is deep, and your team already knows it. The AI Visibility Toolkit is a genuine addition, not a checkbox.

Key features:

  • The SEO toolkit you know: Position Tracking, Site Audit, Keyword Research, Competitive Analysis, backlink tools.
  • AI Visibility Toolkit: brand performance across Google Search AI features, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, with prompt monitoring, AI sentiment, custom prompts, and MCP access.
  • Content Marketing Platform, sold separately: Topic Research, SEO Writing Assistant, Content Audit, Post Tracking.
  • Integrations with Google Docs, Search Console, Trello, Slack, Zapier, and an App Center with dozens more.

Pricing on annual billing starts at $117.33/mo for the SEO Toolkit with basic AI Visibility, $165.17/mo Starter (50 AI prompts/day, AI-ready Site Audit, MCP access), $248.17/mo Pro+ (15 sites, content optimization, cannibalization analysis), and $455.67/mo Advanced (40 sites, SEO Share of Voice, API access).

The honest limitation: the pieces are sold separately and the total climbs fast. AI Visibility sits on top of the SEO suite, the Content Marketing Platform is another line item, and there's no in-house publish-ready writer comparable to a dedicated production pipeline. Multi-tenant workspace-per-client architecture is also thinner than agency-first tools; you're working within consolidated project quotas. The Agency Partners program is a lead-generation channel, not workspace architecture. Worth knowing before you plan your rollout around it.

Where AI search actually fits

Quick reality check, because this is where agencies either overcorrect or freeze.

Google still owns roughly 91% of global search. AI answers are not replacing that this year. Search volume is still search volume, and the SEO work you sell today is not going anywhere.

At the same time, the AI-referral picture is moving fast. ChatGPT's share of AI referral traffic has been sliding while Gemini has more than doubled and Perplexity keeps climbing. Traffic from AI search tends to convert at a much higher rate than traditional organic, but it's still a small slice of total organic volume today.

Both things are true. High intent, small absolute numbers, growing quickly.

So what do you tell a client? Something like this: AI search is a small channel that converts well and is compounding, and the work that wins there is mostly the work that wins in classic SEO anyway. Clear structure, real answers near the top, pages that deserve to be cited.

The practical move is to track more than one engine. If you're only watching ChatGPT, you're watching a shrinking share of a growing pie. That's the case for AI SEO tools client work can lean on for both layers at once, rather than one tool for rankings and a second for AI answers that never talk to each other.

How to choose

Four tools, four different shops. Be honest about which one you run.

Pick DeepSmith if you're selling an AI-search-visibility retainer and need publish-ready articles per client without rebuilding brand context every time. It's the only entry here that holds visibility data and production in the same workspace, against the same brand context, for the same client. If your bottleneck is production and reporting, this is the fit.

Pick Surfer if you're primarily an on-page SEO shop, your writers already live in that editor, and AI visibility is a useful extra layer. Just budget for Scale or above, since the entry tier has no AI tracking, and for Enterprise if you need real white-label.

Pick Scalenut if you want human GEO strategists working alongside the software and you're willing to pay for the higher tiers to unlock more engines and unlimited workspaces. The VIP service is a genuine option if you'd rather buy a team than hire one.

Pick Semrush if you're already standardized on it and want AI visibility without leaving the ecosystem. Go in with clear eyes on total cost once the Content Marketing Platform and AI Visibility stack on top of the SEO suite.

Not sure? Start with the deliverable you're selling next quarter, then work backwards to the tool. That's a better question than "which is best," and it's the one your P&L is actually asking.

One more filter, and it's the one people skip. Run the shortlist against your worst month, not your best one. The month a strategist leaves, three clients want reports in the same week, and a new logo lands. AI SEO tools client work depends on have to hold up there, because that's when tooling either carries you or quietly stops getting used.

Try it on one client first

You don't need to migrate your whole roster this month. Pick one client, the one who asked about ChatGPT, and set up a single workspace.

DeepSmith runs a 7-day free trial with a working workspace populated before you pay: brand brief, competitors, starter tracking prompts, and a first batch of ideas. Run it on that one account, see what the visibility data says, and produce two articles against the gaps.

One client. One month. That's the whole first step.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI SEO tool for an agency?

For most agencies selling AI-search visibility as a service, DeepSmith is the strongest fit, because it holds visibility tracking and publish-ready content production in one workspace per client with brand context stored rather than re-briefed. If your work is mostly on-page optimization, Surfer fits better. If you want human strategists included, look at Scalenut. If you're already deep in Semrush, adding its AI Visibility Toolkit is the path of least resistance.

Do agencies need a separate AI-search visibility tool, or is classic SEO enough?

Classic SEO is still the bulk of the value, and Google still carries the overwhelming majority of search volume. What classic SEO can't tell you is whether an AI engine names your client, cites their pages, or hands the answer to a competitor. That's a different measurement, and clients are asking about it by name now. You need the visibility layer to answer the question, not to replace the SEO work. The AEO SEO tools agencies get the most from tend to be the ones that sit next to the SEO work rather than in a separate tab nobody opens.

Which AI engines should we be tracking?

More than one. ChatGPT's share of AI referral traffic has been falling while Gemini more than doubled and Perplexity grew strongly, so a ChatGPT-only view gets less representative every quarter. Check which engines a tool covers at the tier you can actually afford, since coverage is usually tiered rather than included.

What should an agency budget for agency AI SEO software?

Entry tiers across this list run from roughly $24 to $117 per month on annual billing, but entry tiers are rarely what an agency ends up on. The features you need for client work (AI tracking, multiple workspaces, white-label reporting) usually sit a tier or two up. Price the tier that matches what you promised the client, and remember that promotional rates revert at renewal.

Can one tool replace an entire SEO stack?

Not entirely, and be suspicious of anyone who says otherwise. Most agencies keep a dedicated technical or backlink tool alongside a production and visibility platform. What you can realistically collapse is the middle of the workflow: research, briefing, drafting, optimization, internal linking, metadata, and reporting. That's where the hours go, and that's where consolidation pays.

Which tool is best for white-label client reporting?

It depends on how much you're willing to spend to put your logo on it. Surfer gates true white-label to its Enterprise tier at $999/mo. Semrush offers branded reports and a client portal through its Agency Partners program, layered on top of your suite cost. DeepSmith produces per-workspace AI-visibility reporting on every plan, covering per-prompt citations, page-level attribution, and competitive benchmarking. Whichever you choose, check the tier the reporting actually lives on before you promise a client a monthly deck.

How do AEO and GEO differ from traditional SEO?

They're the same instinct pointed at a different surface. Traditional SEO optimizes for a ranked list of links. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) are two names for optimizing so AI engines mention your brand or cite your pages inside the answer itself. The measurement changes most: instead of positions and clicks, you're tracking mention rate, citation rate, and share of voice across a set of prompts. The underlying craft, which is clear structure and content worth citing, carries over almost entirely.