Peec AI is a tracker that shows you the gap and leaves the writing to you, while Conductor is an enterprise suite that drafts the page but leaves publishing to your CMS. Peec AI suits teams that already have writers, and Conductor suits large teams that can buy through a sales process. DeepSmith is the alternative that tracks the gap, writes the article, publishes it to your CMS and repurposes it for other channels on one self-serve plan.
You found a gap in AI answers, and now you need to know which tool gets you from that gap to a live page. That is the real question in Peec AI vs Conductor for content creation. One of them stops at the data, and the other stops at the draft. DeepSmith covers the last steps as well, which is why it sits in this comparison.
Peec AI vs Conductor: the short answer
- Choose DeepSmith if you want one self-serve plan from $99 a month that tracks AI visibility, writes the article, publishes it to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity or Contentful, and turns it into channel posts.
- Choose Peec AI if you only need tracking at a published price (Starter is $95 a month for 50 prompts) and your own writers or AI tools will make the content.
- Choose Conductor if you are a large team that wants drafts grounded in brand context inside an enterprise SEO suite, and you are fine with a sales-led contract and no public prices.
| DeepSmith | Peec AI | Conductor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price (monthly) | $99 (Pro) | $95 (Starter) | Not published |
| Annual price (per month) | $80 (Pro) | $80 (Starter, seen 2026-09-04) | Not published |
| Free trial | 7 days | Yes, length not stated | Yes, 3 weeks |
| Recommended actions | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Content briefs or outlines | Partial | Partial | Yes |
| Writes full articles | Yes | No | Yes |
| Brand context grounding | Yes | Partial | Yes |
| Publishes directly to a CMS | Yes | Not listed | No |
| Repurposes into channel formats | Yes | Not listed | Partial |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 | 4.8/5 | 4.5/5 |
Pricing and features as of September 2026, from each vendor's site and public reviews.
Peec AI
Peec AI is an AI search analytics tool from Berlin. It runs your tracked prompts every day and reports visibility, position, sentiment, share of voice and the sources each answer cites. It is built for SEO, content and marketing teams, and for agencies, that want a published price. Starter is $95 a month with unlimited users, and Pro is $245.
The standout for this job is its Actions feature. It groups the sources AI cites, finds where competitors are named and you are not, and gives prioritized on-page and off-page actions with an opportunity score. The limit is where it ends. Peec's own FAQ says you create the content yourself, and briefs or rewrites only happen if you connect an outside assistant through its MCP server. No page we reviewed mentions publishing to a CMS. Reviewers on G2 give it 4.8/5 from 20 reviews (checked September 2026), which is a small base, and some say the recommendations feel generic.
Conductor
Conductor is an enterprise SEO and AEO platform founded in 2006. It pairs AI visibility tracking with Creator, a Writing Assistant that makes outlines and full drafts, plus site monitoring and API and MCP access. It is built for large teams that can buy on a sales-led, usage-based contract. Plans are Essentials, Growth and Enterprise, and none show a dollar price.
The standout is that the gap and the draft live in one system. Its recommendations link straight into the Writing Assistant, and Content Profiles and Knowledge Sources ground drafts in your voice and company files. The limit is the last step. Conductor's own FAQ says final publishing remains in your CMS, and it says people should review every draft. Drafts are capped by plan, at 60 a year on Essentials and 180 on Growth. G2 shows 4.5/5 from 788 reviews (checked September 2026), with praise for support and complaints about price for smaller teams and a learning curve.
DeepSmith: the alternative that publishes the gap pages it finds
The gap in this pair is clear. Peec AI shows you where you are missing and stops. Conductor drafts the page, which is a real step further, but the page still has to be moved into your CMS by hand and turned into channel posts by someone else. For a team trying to close many gaps, those last steps are where the work piles up.
DeepSmith keeps it in one loop. AI Visibility tracks the prompts that matter and shows which pages AI cites. Opportunity Agents read that data and return content ideas, each one carrying the data point that justifies it. The Writer turns a planned idea into a finished article grounded in Deep IQ, your stored brand context, with internal and external links, a cover image and publish-ready metadata. Autowrite can do it on a set date with no one in the app. From Produced Content you publish straight to WordPress, Webflow, Strapi, Sanity or Contentful, or to your own webhook, and every article arrives with social posts already written.
Plans are $99 for Pro (20 articles and 50 tracked prompts a month), $199 for Grow and $399 for Scale, or $80, $160 and $299 billed annually. There is a 7-day free trial and no long-term contract. DeepSmith is rated 4.8/5 on G2.
From visibility gap to recommendation
Conductor is a little ahead here, because its recommendation cards hand you straight into drafting. Its Recommendations panel ranks actions from mention, citation and sentiment signals, shows the top five prompts for each one, and links into Writing Assistant. Peec AI's Actions are good too, with a relative opportunity score and both on-page and off-page steps, but they end as guidance for you to carry out. Both are strong at spotting the gap, so the difference is what happens next.
What DeepSmith does: Opportunity Agents turn your visibility data into ideas with the evidence attached, such as the competitor page winning the citations and the gap on your own site. Each idea goes into New Ideas and then Planned Content, so the gap becomes a scheduled article instead of a note in a report.
Drafting and brand grounding
Conductor wins this one, since Peec AI does not write articles. Conductor's Writing Assistant drafts from a brief, scores topical coverage as you edit, and takes up to five knowledge sources per draft. Peec AI has brand context for its agent and suggestions, but it is not used to write content. The fair caveat on Conductor is that the vendor wants every draft reviewed by people, and the yearly draft caps matter if you plan to publish at volume.
What DeepSmith does: The Writer runs every article against Deep IQ, which stores your product, persona, voice, content type and visual guidelines once, so you do not re-brief each piece. Output is publish-ready, not a first draft to rescue, and the pipeline adds internal linking and metadata during writing.
Publishing and repurposing
This is close to a tie, because neither tool gets a page live. Conductor says publishing stays in your CMS, and its Drupal integration gives guidance inside the editor before you publish rather than pushing the page out. Peec AI's pages do not mention CMS publishing, so it is not listed for it. On repurposing, Conductor builds image briefs and video scripts from brand context, which is partial, and Peec AI does not list repurposing at all.
What DeepSmith does: Publishing is a step in the product. From Produced Content you review, edit and publish to your CMS in one action, and the Apps Library turns the same article into versions for LinkedIn, X, Medium, Substack, email and more, in your brand voice. This is the step that separates Peec AI vs Conductor content from visibility gaps from a loop that finishes.
Pricing and value
Peec AI wins on clarity, since its prices are public and self-serve. Starter is $95 a month and Pro is $245, with extra models sold as add-ons, and tracking is all you get for that money. Conductor publishes allowances but no prices. It lists 2,500 AI Search credits a year on Essentials and Growth, and third-party research reports that each answer costs between 0.1 and 2 credits depending on the engine, so the amount you can track depends on the engines you pick. Its published terms are noncancellable by default with 90 days' notice to stop a renewal.
What DeepSmith does: One published price covers tracking and production together, from $99 a month with 20 articles included, and you can leave without a contract. You are not buying a tracker and then paying for the content separately.
Which should you choose
- DeepSmith: you want to find the gap, write the page, publish it and share it from one self-serve plan, whether you are a content team, a marketing lead or an agency.
- Peec AI: you want a tracker at a public price and already have writers, or you plan to use your own AI tools for the content.
- Conductor: you are a large enterprise team that wants AI visibility, drafting and site monitoring in one suite and can run a sales-led contract.
If you are still deciding between the two trackers on the whole, the full comparison covers more than this one job.
Try DeepSmith free for 7 days and take one visibility gap all the way to a published page: start your free trial.
